.Safeguard.... thanks for suggesting to google .... I googled "UV degradation of EDTA" and lots of information came up!
:gthanks:
.
Great Posts Missy!
But, I was wondering if you have a link that I could read more about it. I really know nothing about EDTA or blood for that matter. I'm an accountant.
" Google " *slaps knee*Safeguard.... thanks for suggesting to google .... I googled "UV degradation of EDTA" and lots of information came up!
:gthanks:
.https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=UV+degradation+of+EDTA
hope that works since it's .ca![]()
..
Got it! Thanks it worked!! I'm checking it out now...
Not to goad, I don't get it either..
So I was reading up on the EDTA, and it looks as though these two scientists wrote an article about it on PubMed.gov.
Appears that introducing oxygen could result in the degradation of EDTA.
I don't really understand it all (I'm an accountant) but you can read more at the link.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16201643
Mehhmm proudfootz, I'm not sure. I think it's just wording.
View attachment 110386
He normally worked 7:30-3:30, which is 8 hours. According to Wiegert, after he talked to Colborn, which I think was around 6:30pm, he got a call from Lenk.
From Wiegert's report, page 8:
I also received a phone call from Manitowoc County Lt. JIM LENK. I informed him of the situation. Lt. LENK informed me he would call some people in and assist us in the investigation.
From Dedering's report, page 13:
On Thursday,1ll03l05 at approximately 1900 hrs., I (DEDERING) did arrive at MANITOWOC
CO. SHERIFF's DEPT. There I met with Det. DENNIS JACOBS, Lt. JAMES LENK, Det.
DAVID REMIKER, and Sgt. ANDREW COLBORN regarding this matter.
So my take on the 11 1/2 hour shift is... his normal 8 hour shift, and he went back to work that evening and assisted for 3 1/2 hours, making it an 11 1/2 hour day (not shift like it's worded in the report). IIRC, Buting and Strang did get some sort of records showing the hours they worked, if Lenk stated he was working for 11 1/2 hours solely on TH's missing person case, I think they would have caught it. JMO
On another note.... these reports are so full of errors, whether typo's or goofy wording, I expect more from LE. Again, JMO. I wonder if they reviewed these reports after they were transcribed? If they don't, maybe they should LOL JMO
I have no idea why it keeps being said that SA said she didn't show. He told Colborn, he told Remiker and Lenk the next day and allowed them to do a walk through of his place, he didn't deny it to O'Neill on the Saturday either, or to Wiegert and Fassbender later.
Robert Fabian mentions in an interview (page 208 CASO) that SA said she didn't show up to Charles, but RF testified and he was not asked about that, and I don't see anywhere in CA's interviews that this is said. I have always thought that if it was said to Charles, it was in regards to the loader, and may not have even been the Monday because according to SA, he never went back to work Monday. And according to the State, SA would have been in his trailer, raping and torturing TH, and then add in the call from Jodi, what time was that? And why would Charles even care if AT showed up to photograph Barb's van? He would care if it was the loader IMO. Nothing in this case ever adds up IMO.
Well then,After doing a little digging on this, I find it is one of KK's 'talking points' in his media campaign last year:
"7. Phone records show 3 calls from Avery to Teresas cell phone on Oct 31. One at 2:24, and one at 2:35both calls Avery uses the *67 feature so Teresa doesnt know it him both placed before she arrives. Then one last call at 4:35 pm, without the *67 feature. Avery first believes he can simply say she never showed up (his original defense), so tries to establish the alibi call after shes already been there, hence the 4:35 call. She will never answer of course, so he doesnt need the *67 feature for that last call."
http://www.thewrap.com/making-a-murderer-prosecutor-ken-kratz-steven-avery-9-reasons-guilty/
Looks like they need to tighten up their documentation procedures. If I submitted something so inaccurate, misleading and late to my boss, I would hear about it, and rightfully so! It is not acceptable for "public servants" to be so incompetent!! IMO, of course.Meh
Wording, typos, truth, lies, coincidences, a bit of embellishments..reports months later.
What's one more document, really?
I do agree once again with you, my friend, perhaps a review of such reports would be a great idea before submitting them.
JMO
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Looks like they need to tighten up their documentation procedures. If I submitted something so inaccurate, misleading and late to my boss, I would hear about it, and rightfully so! It is not acceptable for "public servants" to be so incompetent!! IMO, of course.
YepLooks like they need to tighten up their documentation procedures. If I submitted something so inaccurate, misleading and late to my boss, I would hear about it, and rightfully so! It is not acceptable for "public servants" to be so incompetent!! IMO, of course.
Sad to say, but apparently many would say, " yep "I wrote this verbatim on Facebook regarding the Dateline video. I think my comments say it all regarding how I feel about this case.
don't want to poison the well and sway any opinions over what the fair outcome of this case should be or how some of the justice professionals acted and continue to act in the video but consider these three point. Would you agree it's better to let 10 guilty men go free than imprison one innocent one? Do evidence tampering and police corruption constitute reasonable doubt and disqualify anyone from a conviction and a default Not Guilty verdict regardless if they committed the crime? Do you want a justice system that's more focused on speculation and revenge than justice and the truth?
I agree,SA had a great life ahead of him.I have one more to add that is the strongest thing to lead me to believe that ALL the evidence was planted. I also do not believe that anyone other than LE planted anything. That does not mean I think LE killed her (though, that is not completely off the table for me), but that something happened to her and LE discovered her at a time they REALLY needed to take SA down.
12) SA would not have committed a murder when everything in his life was looking up to the degree it was. He was in the middle of a $36 million civil suit. He probably wouldn't have gotten that much, but he would have gotten a pretty penny still. He was being paraded around by influential people, such as gov's and such, they were naming a bill after him. He had dinners planned for him (such as the Innocence Project dinner he was scheduled to go to, the one that LE mocked he wouldn't be going to while they were searching his house).
There is waaaaaaay too much wrong with these cases on a whole, for it to be coincidence. You do not deviate from so many protocol's as they did without it all being a stinky pile of fish. Their mistake was that they felt safe enough to do all this without being able to look into the future and see just how thoroughly everything about these cases would be dissected and examined by so many capable people. Their complete arrogance is what set them up for this fall they are now feeling and I believe Zellner will be bringing this whole house of cards down in the near future. IMHO. I, for one, cannot wait to see how this all plays out, as my husband thinks I am a complete nutjob right now, because this is ALL I talk about. I am looking forward to the day I can go back to being just my normal self and start focusing more on my everyday life. He is looking forward to that day too, LOL.