http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/s/smart_kristin.html
This case was looked at by LE when Scott Peterson killed Laci Peterson, as the police were looking to Scott who lived nearby and went to the same school as Kristin Smart did when Kristin disappeared.
It's an unsolved case, although the parents did have Kristin by now, declared dead in 2002 and her body never found.
The POI however, has never been officially cleared.
Unless there is a great decline in this person, I doubt that he will ever come clean on this case, looking at the natal chart. There is a decidedly "weak" manner to the person, so i'ts very possible the mother will continue to protect his "rights" to not speak out.
This is not a strong forthright personality, with too many planets in Libra for instance, taking the easy path in life. (The constant taking of the 5th Amendment) with the simplest of questions put to him.
This has worked very well for him all of these years, and I see no reason why it will not continue to work well in the future. There is no Regulus in his chart that predicts a Fall in life for instance, just an "easy" time of it and not necessarily a person of conscience. Taking the easy road seems more likely.
As to the date of Kristin's disappearance?
I think PF (POI) own transits to his natal that day, proves the case and the LE has the right person.
But that's just (IMO) based upon the following:
When Kristin disappeared the POI natal shows TR Atropos conjunct his natal
Mars (aggression by the person over another) as there is a conjunction with natal Uranus (erratic and even unexpected behaviors can be triggered)
Transiting Pluto conjuncts his natal Venus within one degree!
This
triggered his very critical
Jupiter conjunct "Alcoyne" at 29Taurus which natally,
Jupiter is quincunx to the Sun (exact orb!) The Sun is the personality and the quincunx is very harsh and biting when triggered.
Transiting NN conjunct his natal Mercury which natally he has
semi square between Mercury & Venus.
They are in fact focusing on the person who needs to be focused upon, imo.
But proving anything may be long and tedious
if ever, as it would require more then just hiding behind the 5th Amendment of the Consititution for even the slightest questions.
leomoon