GA GA - Katherine Janness & Dog Bowie Fatally Stabbed - Piedmont Park, Atlanta, 2021 #5

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
<modsnip. - quoted post was removed>

Joe Scott Morgan’s former employer (Ful Co ME Office) is the party that released KJs ME report without statement.

What are y’all’s thoughts about that? Did that also jeopardize the investigation?
An autopsy is no one’s business but the family’s. They should be the ones to say if it is released to the public or not. And I do believe that facts in this/any autopsy can inform the killer/s and therefore possibly cause ground to be lost in an investigation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And I've got another little tidbit for you. If the killer works like how I think he works, he returned to the scene of a crime and often. He probably got himself cleaned up that night, and came back and watched the police work. That was part of the thrill of it.
 
It seems Joseph Scott Morgan (former senior investigator with the Fulton County ME Office) (in his Body Bags Podcast) says the killer took his time. DA Fani Willis said the same in a press conference early on.
I have listened to Morgan lots of times on his podcast and as he sometimes appears on others. I respect him tremendously. But what does he mean by "took their time?" A killer with a knife could have killed KJ in 10 seconds. So keeping that in mind, pulling her under a tree and assaulting here for 5 minutes would be "taking their time." It might have been longer, but it wouldn't have needed to be. I think those injuries, as horrific as they are, COULD have been done in 5 minutes.
 
I have listened to Morgan lots of times on his podcast and as he sometimes appears on others. I respect him tremendously. But what does he mean by "took their time?" A killer with a knife could have killed KJ in 10 seconds. So keeping that in mind, pulling her under a tree and assaulting here for 5 minutes would be "taking their time." It might have been longer, but it wouldn't have needed to be. I think those injuries, as horrific as they are, COULD have been done in 5 minutes.
These were injuries in precise locations. So you need a steady hand, you need to go slowly, then you got to think about what you're going to do, where to place it, you have to pull the knife out, maybe you got to change knives, let your arms rest for a little bit. I mean this could take some time. But yeah I don't think he stayed there too long. I would think half an hour, tops. But that's just my guess. I mean he could have stayed until EC got there. And in fact he could have went and washed up in the lake changed and came back for the police.
 
I went down a rabbit hole looking for info on mutilation in homicides. Most are behind a paywall, and I can only access the abstracts, but the abstracts still shed some light on the research.

I’d never heard this term before- “piquerist”.

“Despite the prevalence of ripper killings in media reports, there is little presence in the academic literature, even less of the psychological, criminological, or forensic aspects of such homicides, particularly regarding any embedded sexual element to such homicides.”

“Whilst most investigators will never encounter a sexual homicide (James and Beauregard 2018), those that encounter such a homicide, with overkill injuries, are likely to miss a piquerist signature hidden beneath the brutality inflicted on the victim (Woods 2006). In practical terms, misinterpreting the motivation for mutilating wounds may hinder efforts to identify perpetrators (Woods 2006, p. 113) as in the following case. Indeed, it is for those reasons that the case has been chosen, to demonstrate piquerism in homicide cases displaying overkill and the difficulty in identifying a piquerist signature in such cases.”

More at the second link below.

Original Citation:
Pettigrew, M. Piquerism in Overkill Homicides: Identifying the Sexual Component in a Series of ‘Ripper’ Killings. J Police Crim Psych 38, 342–352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09510-0

Largest abstract of above article
 
I went down a rabbit hole looking for info on mutilation in homicides. Most are behind a paywall, and I can only access the abstracts, but the abstracts still shed some light on the research.

I’d never heard this term before- “piquerist”.

“Despite the prevalence of ripper killings in media reports, there is little presence in the academic literature, even less of the psychological, criminological, or forensic aspects of such homicides, particularly regarding any embedded sexual element to such homicides.”

“Whilst most investigators will never encounter a sexual homicide (James and Beauregard 2018), those that encounter such a homicide, with overkill injuries, are likely to miss a piquerist signature hidden beneath the brutality inflicted on the victim (Woods 2006). In practical terms, misinterpreting the motivation for mutilating wounds may hinder efforts to identify perpetrators (Woods 2006, p. 113) as in the following case. Indeed, it is for those reasons that the case has been chosen, to demonstrate piquerism in homicide cases displaying overkill and the difficulty in identifying a piquerist signature in such cases.”

More at the second link below.

Original Citation:
Pettigrew, M. Piquerism in Overkill Homicides: Identifying the Sexual Component in a Series of ‘Ripper’ Killings. J Police Crim Psych 38, 342–352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09510-0

Largest abstract of above article

Yes that's very interesting, I read those links. That is pretty much exactly the problem. Every time somebody sees overkill, everyone thinks, oh it must be a scorned lover, or that perp must be really angry at the victim. Even police think that. When that is usually not the case.



I went down a rabbit hole looking for info on mutilation in homicides. Most are behind a paywall, and I can only access the abstracts, but the abstracts still shed some light on the research.

I’d never heard this term before- “piquerist”.

“Despite the prevalence of ripper killings in media reports, there is little presence in the academic literature, even less of the psychological, criminological, or forensic aspects of such homicides, particularly regarding any embedded sexual element to such homicides.”

“Whilst most investigators will never encounter a sexual homicide (James and Beauregard 2018), those that encounter such a homicide, with overkill injuries, are likely to miss a piquerist signature hidden beneath the brutality inflicted on the victim (Woods 2006). In practical terms, misinterpreting the motivation for mutilating wounds may hinder efforts to identify perpetrators (Woods 2006, p. 113) as in the following . Indeed, it is for those reasons that the case has been chosen, to demonstrate piquerism in homicide cases displaying overkill and the difficulty in identifying a piquerist signature in such cases.”

More at the second link below.

Original Citation:
Pettigrew, M. Piquerism in Overkill Homicides: Identifying the Sexual Component in a Series of ‘Ripper’ Killings. J Police Crim Psych 38, 342–352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09510-0

Largest abstract of above article
 
I went down a rabbit hole looking for info on mutilation in homicides. Most are behind a paywall, and I can only access the abstracts, but the abstracts still shed some light on the research.

I’d never heard this term before- “piquerist”.

“Despite the prevalence of ripper killings in media reports, there is little presence in the academic literature, even less of the psychological, criminological, or forensic aspects of such homicides, particularly regarding any embedded sexual element to such homicides.”

“Whilst most investigators will never encounter a sexual homicide (James and Beauregard 2018), those that encounter such a homicide, with overkill injuries, are likely to miss a piquerist signature hidden beneath the brutality inflicted on the victim (Woods 2006). In practical terms, misinterpreting the motivation for mutilating wounds may hinder efforts to identify perpetrators (Woods 2006, p. 113) as in the following case. Indeed, it is for those reasons that the case has been chosen, to demonstrate piquerism in homicide cases displaying overkill and the difficulty in identifying a piquerist signature in such cases.”

More at the second link below.

Original Citation:
Pettigrew, M. Piquerism in Overkill Homicides: Identifying the Sexual Component in a Series of ‘Ripper’ Killings. J Police Crim Psych 38, 342–352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09510-0

Largest abstract of above article
You might be interested in two articles I posted when I first joined this thread. My post about them is in Thread #5, #300 post. I believe the perpetrator in this case is a sexual sadist.
 

Attachments

  • the-sadistic-murderer.pdf
    831.1 KB · Views: 5
  • The_sexually_sadistic_serial_killer 2.pdf
    476 KB · Views: 3
I went down a rabbit hole looking for info on mutilation in homicides. Most are behind a paywall, and I can only access the abstracts, but the abstracts still shed some light on the research.

I’d never heard this term before- “piquerist”.

“Despite the prevalence of ripper killings in media reports, there is little presence in the academic literature, even less of the psychological, criminological, or forensic aspects of such homicides, particularly regarding any embedded sexual element to such homicides.”

“Whilst most investigators will never encounter a sexual homicide (James and Beauregard 2018), those that encounter such a homicide, with overkill injuries, are likely to miss a piquerist signature hidden beneath the brutality inflicted on the victim (Woods 2006). In practical terms, misinterpreting the motivation for mutilating wounds may hinder efforts to identify perpetrators (Woods 2006, p. 113) as in the following case. Indeed, it is for those reasons that the case has been chosen, to demonstrate piquerism in homicide cases displaying overkill and the difficulty in identifying a piquerist signature in such cases.”

More at the second link below.

Original Citation:
Pettigrew, M. Piquerism in Overkill Homicides: Identifying the Sexual Component in a Series of ‘Ripper’ Killings. J Police Crim Psych 38, 342–352 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09510-0

Largest abstract of above article

Yes, the possibility of piquerism has been discussed about this case since the very beginning...my post about it back in 2021 and I was not even the first to bring it up: Post in thread 'GA - Katherine Janness, 40, fatally stabbed and dog killed, Piedmont Park, Atlanta, 28 Jul 2021 #3' GA - Katherine Janness, 40, fatally stabbed and dog killed, Piedmont Park, Atlanta, 28 Jul 2021 #3

I have always believed the stabbing and mutilation had a sexual component and was not overkill from a person known to her/mad at her.
 
Yes, the possibility of piquerism has been discussed about this case since the very beginning...my post about it back in 2021 and I was not even the first to bring it up: Post in thread 'GA - Katherine Janness, 40, fatally stabbed and dog killed, Piedmont Park, Atlanta, 28 Jul 2021 #3' GA - Katherine Janness, 40, fatally stabbed and dog killed, Piedmont Park, Atlanta, 28 Jul 2021 #3

I have always believed the stabbing and mutilation had a sexual component and was not overkill from a person known to her/mad at her.
<modsnip - discussing other members> and I think have well supported, especially with that podcast I linked, that the nature of the injuries were very unusual and precise, and show there was some organized thought going on there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So here's a new thought. How did this attack occur, just out of range of camera? If it was an unorganized perp, how did he manage to be just out of range of camera? That's incredibly lucky right? And also managed to not go through the gate that was right there, and then be caught on camera. And if it was an organized perp, how was he so sure, that he would manage to make sure Katie did not run 'out' of the park and into camera range? Because she was so close. And do you think he chose that location on purpose to taunt? Him saying like, I can commit this murder right next to the camera, and you still can't catch me.
 
I just had an idea. I think this perp committed this murder in that park, right out in the open, right next to a path, for a couple reasons. One, he wanted to terrorize a whole city by being in a public area.
But two, just as importantly, because he wanted access to the crime scene. I think he wanted to be there when the police processed the scene, so he could watch it. Because if you commit a crime scene anywhere else, like in someone's home, or even out in the woods somewhere, as the perpetrator, you cannot just come by and swing around and see what's going on. It would look pretty suspicious. But in a large public park, it would look a lot less suspicious. You just happened to be walking by. And on that note, I hope they really took a good look at the WTF guy. Or anyone who was at the crime scene that night.
 
I just had an idea. I think this perp committed this murder in that park, right out in the open, right next to a path, for a couple reasons. One, he wanted to terrorize a whole city by being in a public area.
But two, just as importantly, because he wanted access to the crime scene. I think he wanted to be there when the police processed the scene, so he could watch it. Because if you commit a crime scene anywhere else, like in someone's home, or even out in the woods somewhere, as the perpetrator, you cannot just come by and swing around and see what's going on. It would look pretty suspicious. But in a large public park, it would look a lot less suspicious. You just happened to be walking by. And on that note, I hope they really took a good look at the WTF guy. Or anyone who was at the crime scene that night.
Interesting ideas, #2 has not been mentioned before to my knowledge.
 
I hope the APD are planning a July 28, 2024 press conference 3 yr update on the investigation of Katie’s and Bowie’s murders. They really need to say more than it is an ongoing investigation, we continue to meet with the FBI and we will solve this case. Please APD provide some of the FBI criminal profile of this perpetrator and other information about what you know from July 27 and 28.
 
I just had an idea. I think this perp committed this murder in that park, right out in the open, right next to a path, for a couple reasons. One, he wanted to terrorize a whole city by being in a public area.
But two, just as importantly, because he wanted access to the crime scene. I think he wanted to be there when the police processed the scene, so he could watch it. Because if you commit a crime scene anywhere else, like in someone's home, or even out in the woods somewhere, as the perpetrator, you cannot just come by and swing around and see what's going on. It would look pretty suspicious. But in a large public park, it would look a lot less suspicious. You just happened to be walking by. And on that note, I hope they really took a good look at the WTF guy. Or anyone who was at the crime scene that night.
Who is the WTF guy?
 
Good video, includes timeline, cctv of witnesses, phone call to 911 & quite likely (imo), also the guy yelling- maybe- WTF.
Approx 2:45
' Aug 4, 2021
911 call and new video in Piedmont Park murder'
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
81
Guests online
1,905
Total visitors
1,986

Forum statistics

Threads
600,241
Messages
18,105,756
Members
230,993
Latest member
Clue Keeper
Back
Top