GeorgiaSunshine
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 120
- Reaction score
- 0
Has anyone noticed that while rotating his head fully left and right and raising upper extremity overhead close to camera for several minutes in bright sunlight that there is not a single visible laceration, abrasion, bruise, swelling or redness visible on SM - on the very parts of a perpetrator's body most likely to be injured when facing their victim while committing murder and cutting the body up? A sharp weapon such as a knife was probably used at some point and repeatedly to dismember multiple large joints of a muscular woman. Blood makes knives slippery and dangerous for the attacker. A sword in one fell swipe? Perhaps but these questions are examples of what a prosecutor must overcome to convince a jury to convict such an unlikely defendant. How likely a gun was used? The Spencers were home and have given statements to reporters. Why would they not mention hearing a sound that could have been a gun shot? SM would not likely have
the physical strength to strangle a 6 feet tall 27 year old athlete even with a device. The camera/reporter crew noticed....zero evidence of his skin being near a knife.
SeaStorm can you please give reference to an article or video you are talking about? I have no idea what you are speaking of, and I agree with the other comments on here that this is a very classy website that talks about opinion if it is not fact, and everyone is quite professional on here. Just travel to a Macon.com article and read the comments there to see the difference, no comparison to Websleuths.