noZme
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2008
- Messages
- 4,238
- Reaction score
- 101
Apparently there were no injuries to his body & he was already dead when decapitated. http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/FBI-Asked-to-help-in-search-for-missing-Ga-woman-258463991.html
"Baffled, Stymied, Stumped" have all been used in headlines or descriptions of this case.... I'll say!!!!
WHY kill this couple who seemed to be happily living out their golden years?
WHY take the head? If you just killed someone, wouldn't you just want to get the he!! out of Dodge ASAP?
WHY take Mrs Dermond? That had to slow "them" down. My first thought was to use her to withdraw money, but that didn't happen. The killing was sooner than we first thought & there has been no report of money or anything else unaccounted for.
I know some neighbors & as to be expected people are freaked out. It is, or was, a safe, quiet, very low crime community. Even though this is an affluent area & many homes have security systems, when the Dermonds built the home, they were likely of the mindset it was a quiet, safe area. Builders haven't always pushed the security options. Even if their home was equipped, they may have only used it when traveling. I think the majority of Georgians are not overly concerned (at least in smaller towns.) However, as mentioned before, outsiders have access to gated neighborhoods. And waterfront property opens another opportunity to access. Random crimes occur more frequently in higher-traffic places. The Law of Averages is more people around, the better chances some are bad. I think the Dermond's house was at the end of a cul-de-sac so they would have had little to no "traffic." I understand their sense of security. Who woulda thunk it?
My suspicions change hourly. Right now, I am leaning toward a nearby nutjob who
for some reason became fixated on them & did a thrill killing. Business retaliation seems unlikely after so many years of retirement. The kids appear financially successful & at almost 90, how much longer could the wait be for inheritance from the parent's estate? Why chance their own futures to grab the money a few years sooner? The son's murder was a long time ago & why would anyone connected to the accused/convicted go after the old folks? But, even a nutjob would need to explain the "whys"... not that violent crimes should make sense to regular people.
Sorry for the rambling thoughts, but at this point, who has more? And by the way, you just gotta like Sheriff Stills.
"Baffled, Stymied, Stumped" have all been used in headlines or descriptions of this case.... I'll say!!!!
WHY kill this couple who seemed to be happily living out their golden years?
WHY take the head? If you just killed someone, wouldn't you just want to get the he!! out of Dodge ASAP?
WHY take Mrs Dermond? That had to slow "them" down. My first thought was to use her to withdraw money, but that didn't happen. The killing was sooner than we first thought & there has been no report of money or anything else unaccounted for.
I know some neighbors & as to be expected people are freaked out. It is, or was, a safe, quiet, very low crime community. Even though this is an affluent area & many homes have security systems, when the Dermonds built the home, they were likely of the mindset it was a quiet, safe area. Builders haven't always pushed the security options. Even if their home was equipped, they may have only used it when traveling. I think the majority of Georgians are not overly concerned (at least in smaller towns.) However, as mentioned before, outsiders have access to gated neighborhoods. And waterfront property opens another opportunity to access. Random crimes occur more frequently in higher-traffic places. The Law of Averages is more people around, the better chances some are bad. I think the Dermond's house was at the end of a cul-de-sac so they would have had little to no "traffic." I understand their sense of security. Who woulda thunk it?
My suspicions change hourly. Right now, I am leaning toward a nearby nutjob who
for some reason became fixated on them & did a thrill killing. Business retaliation seems unlikely after so many years of retirement. The kids appear financially successful & at almost 90, how much longer could the wait be for inheritance from the parent's estate? Why chance their own futures to grab the money a few years sooner? The son's murder was a long time ago & why would anyone connected to the accused/convicted go after the old folks? But, even a nutjob would need to explain the "whys"... not that violent crimes should make sense to regular people.
Sorry for the rambling thoughts, but at this point, who has more? And by the way, you just gotta like Sheriff Stills.