Spice
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 1,601
- Reaction score
- 19
Bbm, I'm guessing THAT was the point of the research, rather than proving how mean and judgmental college students are. :seeya:
Or how their group dynamic affected their dislike for the student. Who was the leader, follower, did anyone stick up for the person? Did they all just fall in line rank and file. So interesting. One of my favorite, most disturbing, and telling (and not considered ethical now) social experiments was The Stanford Prison Experiment. Very telling about situational power and human behavior. Some people were put in position of guards and the other prisoners, their transformation in exerting power over the "prisoners" and actually hating them and wanting to dominate them was SO swift the experiment had to be stopped.
It also had psychological implications for the participants which is why it is now unethical. They were rightly disturbed by how quickly they "changed" and horribly they treated other human beings when put in the position of power. Therefore, it violated some ethics of social research. Still, the results were frightening and fascinating regarding human behavior and power.
In 1971, a team of psychologists designed and executed an unusual experiment that used a mock prison setting, with college students role-playing prisoners and guards to test the power of the social situation to determine behavior. The research, known as the Stanford Prison Experiment, has become a classic demonstration of situational power to influence individual attitudes, values and behavior. So extreme, swift and unexpected were the transformations of character in many of the participants that this study -- planned to last two-weeks -- had to be terminated by the sixth day.
http://www.apa.org/research/action/prison.aspx