OriginalJerseyGirl
CERTIFIED FLYERS FANATIC!
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2005
- Messages
- 7,203
- Reaction score
- 20
I found an interesting post on another forum here at WS. Here's the portion that intrigued me:
I found a mistake, or at least John Douglas has written differently in one of his books. In the appeals states brief it is stated RR .40: 3691-93 and it looks like it came also from the FBI that defendants bring knives to a crime scene. If my memory serves me the case John Douglas talks about in one of his books. The husband of the victim is suspect until he learns something. Criminals talk to each other in jail. They obviously have the time on their hands. They teach each other stuff, like don't break into a house with a weapon. If caught, and there is always a chance, you will get more time as you can say I only commited B AND E the state can say but with intent to do harm cause you brought a weapon with you. Logic tells you that every house in America has some kitchen knives. If you do break in, with your own knife, and eventually have a confrontation with the home owner and commit murder you get dp in some states cause it shows premeditated murder. If you were only there to rob why did you bring a weapon with you-clear intent. I swear it is in one of John Douglas's books. Since I use my public library I don't have a copy to quote. I can't remember the title either but I think the cover has his picture on it.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Poll: Did Darlie Routier murder her children?
I'm not sure what I think of this and I haven't been able to locate anything to either support or refute this concept just yet. (Of course, no matter how much information we find, it still can't account for every situation but it's an interesting thing to ponder nonetheless.) Any thoughts?
I found a mistake, or at least John Douglas has written differently in one of his books. In the appeals states brief it is stated RR .40: 3691-93 and it looks like it came also from the FBI that defendants bring knives to a crime scene. If my memory serves me the case John Douglas talks about in one of his books. The husband of the victim is suspect until he learns something. Criminals talk to each other in jail. They obviously have the time on their hands. They teach each other stuff, like don't break into a house with a weapon. If caught, and there is always a chance, you will get more time as you can say I only commited B AND E the state can say but with intent to do harm cause you brought a weapon with you. Logic tells you that every house in America has some kitchen knives. If you do break in, with your own knife, and eventually have a confrontation with the home owner and commit murder you get dp in some states cause it shows premeditated murder. If you were only there to rob why did you bring a weapon with you-clear intent. I swear it is in one of John Douglas's books. Since I use my public library I don't have a copy to quote. I can't remember the title either but I think the cover has his picture on it.
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Poll: Did Darlie Routier murder her children?
I'm not sure what I think of this and I haven't been able to locate anything to either support or refute this concept just yet. (Of course, no matter how much information we find, it still can't account for every situation but it's an interesting thing to ponder nonetheless.) Any thoughts?