sirensong
Active Member
Wouldn't it be fantastic, if the reason CA had a new washer was because the police took the old one? We can hope
Wouldn't it be fantastic, if the reason CA had a new washer was because the police took the old one? We can hope
I find it hard to believe that after CA told LE that she washed the pants LE didn't think to take the washer if they thought it could have been of any use.
I was thinking the same thing. It is my opinion as well that there would be no DNA present in the washer either. I don't think LE seized the washer. I'm not sure that the A's bought a new one either. I can't tell from the pictures. And if they did, I would think that someone from the appliance store that they bought it from, would have came forward into the media and spoke about it. JMO.At the time, Caylee was a missing child, they would have had to get a search and seize paper~......yeah, I know...the smell and the Cindy & George Spontaneous utterance should have been enough of a huge red flag but...the probability of recovery of anything of forensic value (ie decomp fluid, DNA) was extremely low, as in nearly zilch
Why? 1. any DNA recovery would "fit" within the occupants of the household BUT utilization of phosphated laundry soaps (Arm & Hammer, :croc:Might be one!) and sodium hypochlorite (bleach :innocent destroy the DNA helix protein bonds :banghead:.
2. also the dilution factor would hamper recovery big time! (and of course those items HAD to go thru a few rinse cycles!) :twocents:
The big issues in this case are time and lies: LE was behind the 8 ball by 31 days from the moment of formal notification by CINDY of the abduction of Caylee. Then they were hogtied by the egg donor-incubator who persisted the abduction story with her lies, forcing LE to conduct homicide type investigations on the "low-down" until they could get paper to access legal searches. Remember, primary search of the car and primary, initial, voluntary, PRODUCTIVE, informative family (C, G, L) interviews were conducted with verbal permission from the car owners (G & C), the house owners (G & C) while the felon to be was conducting her fairytale job tour!
The media was parked outside the Anthony home for months. If the Anthony's would have replaced a washer and dryer, the media would have picked it up ASAP. Remember the neighbors, ("Dicken's) they would have been the first ones to call LE if this even happened.
IMO, I think the chatter about the "washer and dryer" is a rumor started long ago.
I know I saw the photos, side by side, old and new- the new was a top loader, the old a front loader. Maybe someone faked it to start a rumor, but I know I saw the photos online. Now if I could just find them......:banghead:
I know I saw the photos, side by side, old and new- the new was a top loader, the old a front loader. Maybe someone faked it to start a rumor, but I know I saw the photos online. Now if I could just find them......:banghead:
In the pics which machine has the glass front, washer or dryer? It has been to the right side in all the pics I have seen.
I'm drawing a blank on finding those photos. Someone posted photos and the topic of discussion was what was stored on top of the washer and dryer- when a poster realised the washing machine was new......
They're always so small. I lightened it for you. Then I found one from July 24, 08. CA in purple.