Does anyone know if there is a time limit on the prosecution's rebuttal closing argument?
Morning everyone...
Praying for Justice for Trayvon!
Also praying for TM's family, GZ's family, the jurors, and the community to accept whatever verdict the jurors give.
I don't think the evidence was there for 2nd degree murder, so I'm hoping for a manslaughter conviction.
WE know that TM talked to GZ first. HE saw him first and spoke first as per state witness RJ.
Testimony under DIRECT.
WE need proof to convict. GZ is the one with the injuries. GZ was the one under neath TM when neighbor comes out.
FACTS in evidence as per the states CIC.
We know that TM was home when he spoke to RJ and told her so. We know that when she calls him back he is winded and breathing heavy and then he sees GZ again. We know that fight occurs close to GZ says he was waiting for police.
WE know that GZ tells police his story immediately without a lawyer and without knowing there are ear witnesses and thinking there is a video.
Then why did he tell the neighbor to phone his wife and tell her he just shot someone? IMO
I called it correctly in the CA case, because the state didn't prove much of anything, not to mention JA was snickering and laughing.
I will now call this case as GZ getting manslaughter, even though I believe he should be acquitted, because MOM is so low-key, like even he doesn't believe what he is saying. He has no passion, no conviction in his voice.
I hope I'm wrong, and this is only MY OPINION.
Yes, but you choose to believe "parts" of RJ testimony. Those that suit your belief of the case. However, you have also chosen to dismiss other parts of RJs testimony, e.g. "why are you following me?" & "get off, get off" which she testifies she heard TM saying.
Yes, but you choose to believe "parts" of RJ testimony. Those that suit your belief of the case. However, you have also chosen to dismiss other parts of RJs testimony, e.g. "why are you following me?" & "get off, get off" which she testifies she heard TM saying.
I can't get any live stream to play smoothly (wftv, wild about) so it is excruciatingly slow. But, this monotone and ridiculous animation (which IMO, purposefully won't play right) is putting me to sleep.
I've read Juror B29 wouldn't look at BDLR but shook her head in agreement with M O'M. She is a Hispanic women who just moved to Florida about four months ago, works at a home for prople with Altzheimer's and she has Eight children. Juror E-40, per Kathi Belich seems uninterested.
I predict Hung Jury.
Per WFTV, jurors didn't take many notes yesterday, but today, they are really going at it.
MOM's sing song all over the map presentation isn't working - even posters here don't know what the long time space here was all about - this jury isn't buying what he's saying and is going to convict GZ of manslaughter - and rightfully so.
I think if the SWAT teams are worried - it's about the reaction from the GZ side and all those gun owners taking the law into their own hands.
IMO