You get the point, quit playing lawyer.
I'm sorry, I was responding to a post you made where you said 'Wrong' in response to another poster stating that what you said is not what GZ was told by the 911 dispatcher. I stated that on the stand this dispatcher stated unequivocally that they are instructed not to give commands. 'Don't follow him" would be a command.
You intimate I am parsing words, but to be honest, a lot of this trial is parsing words in a sense. I think everyone agrees, maybe I'm wrong, that there was a lot of miscommunication on the night of this event. GZ mistook TM for being an interloper, TM mistook GZ as someone intending to harm him. Maybe you think GZ intended to harm TM the moment he saw him, I don't really know.
But words do matter, and the dispatcher saying 'we really don't need you to do that' could mean to GZ that LE didn't want him to take any chances, but GZ believed he was acting as NW and therefore, doing what was expected. We don't know what TM thought, but it sounds like GZ did not think he was doing anything extrordinary or over the line.