http://www.wftv.com/video/22848262/index.html
When I watched this video River says Something to Kalani at.52/53 mark George but I can not make out the rest anyone else know what she says to him?She also looks very nervous of what Kalani might say she is trying to get him to her car.I would think she must know him well to have driven him there JMO.
Watching this video, I think of the word "starstruck." The Anthonys are "celebrities" to these people....no matter the horrendous way George, Cindy, and Casey came to "stardom." I think River, etc. feel, with their access to the Anthonys, as if they have been drawn into the inner circle of Brad Pitt and Angelina...and this "drama" in this video is to make their "status" clear to the media.They are not just crime groupies...THEY are far ABOVE the rest of the crowd that gathers outside the house. They have phone numbers;they have a relationship with these "celebrities." I absolutely can see people with this mindset saving every scrap of their connection to these "celebrity" friends. ("See here's a text from Brad in 2006...that's Angelina's dog I'm walking...here I am behind Brad in this picture from 2004...")
Of course, she has texts from George and maybe much more. She would hang onto every scrap related to these people. And therein might lie the crucial part of the story.
Does this make River, etc. "bad people"...no? Does this mean that they are not credible? No. (As for trashing the Enquirer...between that paper and the NYT, who had the truth on John Edwards?)
Although this affair story is salacious and interesting to the public, it would have no value to the case, as many of you have stated, unless it is part of a larger story. I think the comment of the news director hints that this is just a window into a big, big room...and therein lies the "bombshell."
Maybe some elements of River's story or her "proof" confirm or support another person's testimony. Suppose this is a warning shot by LE that there are events, statements etc...in that last period before Caylee was found...and they are telling George and Cindy..."DO YOU GET IT...WE KNOW!"
It is in the best interest of the State and the taxpayer's for the Anthony's to be forced to drop this charade. Cindy, IMO, has spent her life...demanding that when SHE says a family matter is over, it's over. She wanted to do that here. Once she accepted Caylee was gone, she wanted her daughter home and the whole matter to go away. Her frustration is the State does not allow HER to absolve her daughter of her granddaughter's death.
In my humble opinion, I think George knew long before Cindy and they all knew long before the baby's body was found...exactly what happened, why and where Little Caylee was.
I think this "leak" is deliberate. I think it signals MORE to the Anthonys than LE knowing about an "affair." It may seem trivial TO US in the context of what we have in OUR possession about the evidence.. but I think the folks on Hopespring Drive who know what REALLY happened here...might just be beginning to understand...it is ALL starting to unravel.
My opinion only.