Denis R Tandib
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2020
- Messages
- 1,960
- Reaction score
- 3,651
People evaluate information differently.Yes, it seems such a small ask, to not doubt that the description of what HeB and MS claim they saw on video was absolutely, no question, the rape and abuse of a 14yr old girl.
And it's fine to doubt HeB and MS but that's not what's happening here. The 'doubt' relates to whether or not what they claim to have seen constitutes rape. Effectively, those believing the account of the witnesses but looking for reasons to downplay and minimise what the witnesses claim to have seen, at the expense of a 14yr old.
It's depressing to read.
If the facts are that the girl was 14, was being held against her will and forcibly being orally raped, I don’t think anyone would disagree that this is an awful crime.
However, do I think HeB and MS are capabable of embellishing their account? yes. Is the age of the alleged victim definite? No. Does what has been reported constitute rape? Not if she consented, this and much worse is readily and legally available on the internet for anyone to view. Finally, despite considerable effort by the BKA, no victim has been found
I really don’t think anyone is trying to downplay what would certainly be the rape of a minor, if what alleged is true.
It might be considered by some as a horrible abusive act on a woman of any age, but that doesn’t make it a crime. I think this is what is being argued - is their doubt that a crime took place here?
IMO, yes, I can’t be sure BARD.