I agree that some have taken John's 2 witnesse's statements as absolute truth which they're not and shouldn't be claimed as such.RSBM
This was exactly why I took issue with Harrison standing up there next to John Ray in that press conference (and in my estimation, why Tierney also took issue with it ). Harrison himself admitted during that PC that the task force was still working on vetting this information. It's a horrific mistake, imo , for the Police Commissioner to appear to give credence to any information that hasn't been thoroughly vetted. This is exactly why we now have people running around stating that it's a fact that AE hosted swinger parties, and that Karen Vergatta definitely was in the Heuermann house the night she went missing and that she ran out of there naked and scared for her life. If this information turns out to be false or mistaken, what do you think the defense is going to do with that ? What do you think AE's attorney will do with that ?
(Not aimed at you at all. I just used your post as a jumping off point. )
imo: I don't think either RH or AE would sue for defamation in civil court.
Discovery would open up another can of worms.
I see Harrison as giving Ray's investigating credence, something which before he arrived was non-existent within the dept and showed that his task force is involved with cases that came from Ray.
Harrison was even present during an interview with one of Ray's witnesses.