Gilgo Beach LISK Serial Killer, Rex Heuermann, charged with 6 murders, July 2023 #12

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
iamshadow21 said:
There's DNA in Tina's case, too.


Since both cases have DNA, they should be easy rule in/outs.

MOO
Click to expand...
My understanding is that in NY, DNA cannot be entered into CODIS until after conviction unless there is probable cause to test. I can only imagine what else police will find once RH is convicted and they can enter his DNA into the national database.
 
Did the information that got LE looking in Manorville come from Bittrolff or his attorney? Pretty sure the sequence of events was Bittrolff files appeal for new trial, LE digs in Manorville, digs in Massapequa Park, files news charges. Since Castilla had originally been assumed to be Bittrolff's victim that they just couldn't prove it (left shoe also missing, as with Rita Tangredi and Colleem McNamee), it would mean that Bittrolff spilled on his co-murdering buddy Rex or that Bittrolff was trying to exonerate himself completely by pinning it on Rex (but how would he know??).

For Michael Brown, there's only one defense left, i.e. that LE fabricated Rex's Murder Diary because they realized their DNA evidence was too thin. On its face, seems a preposterous claim, but a defense attorney needs to sow doubt in just one juror's mind, that's the game.
 
Izzylizzy said:
What happened to the old "my client said he didn't do this" or your "this case is circumstantial" ?


'Heuermann's attorney, Michael Brown, said outside court that he couldn't immediately discuss the new charges.

"Heuermann’s attorney, Michael Brown, entered a not-guilty plea on behalf of his client. Outside of court, Brown said he could not immediately discuss the new charges.

"It’s hard for me to comment without looking at documents and without speaking to my client and looking into the evidence," Brown told reporters. "It wouldn’t be fair for me to comment at this point in time."


www.nbcnewyork.com

Accused Gilgo killer indicted in murders of 2 more women, including previously unknown victim

The New York City architect arrested last year in connection with a string of cold case bodies found on Long Island’s Gilgo Beach has been charged with murder in the deaths of two more victims, including one whose name hadn’t been publicly associated with the investigation prior to Thursday...
www.nbcnewyork.com www.nbcnewyork.com
Click to expand...
Maybe he has a conscience and is doing the minimal that ethics requires. He does have a mother and possibly a wife and daughter. MOO
 
Mountain_Kat said:
One thing I hope we don't begin to lose sight of is the fact that, just because he may have dismembered or mutilated one victim in his home during a certain time period, that doesn't mean that he might not have also killed another victim via strangulation in a hotel or in his vehicle during the same time period. I say that because I was convinced pretty early on that LISK didn't dismember, and I think it made me overlook some UID's because I thought I had this guy figured out. BOY, was I mistaken !
Click to expand...
And it looks like he changed the ways he did things on purpose to throw off his scent to LE. It was part of his game of the hunt! MOO.
 
jessr927 said:
His first wife moved out in September 93 and Sandra was killed in November. His mom had moved out prior to the wife. So I think you're right. If he's not responsible for any of the 1980s victims, Sandra was likely his first.
Click to expand...

Unless he was.

I know there is a lot of research to be done, but I just do feel there are earlier ones.
 
PreciousDust said:
Did the information that got LE looking in Manorville come from Bittrolff or his attorney? Pretty sure the sequence of events was Bittrolff files appeal for new trial, LE digs in Manorville, digs in Massapequa Park, files news charges. Since Castilla had originally been assumed to be Bittrolff's victim that they just couldn't prove it (left shoe also missing, as with Rita Tangredi and Colleem McNamee), it would mean that Bittrolff spilled on his co-murdering buddy Rex or that Bittrolff was trying to exonerate himself completely by pinning it on Rex (but how would he know??).

For Michael Brown, there's only one defense left, i.e. that LE fabricated Rex's Murder Diary because they realized their DNA evidence was too thin. On its face, seems a preposterous claim, but a defense attorney needs to sow doubt in just one juror's mind, that's the game.
Click to expand...
Well, they knew the hair that was found on Sandra wasn't Bittrolff's. He was excluded from contributing it.

So if it was left by her killer, they had to look elsewhere. And their microscopic examination of RH's life would have showed them that at the time Sandra was killed, he lived alone.

He needed to be ruled out, but that didn't happen. The hair was his.

I don't know what this is going to mean for JB, but I suspect that his DNA on his two victims is still going to be the stronger argument than a variation on the SODDI defense. And I don't see him sitting in prison for a decade on his tod if he did it with RH without saying a word.

And RH doesn't strike me as the sort to share. I think he's a loner, not someone who wants a partner-killer.

MOO
 
Bobbbbberson said:
My understanding is that in NY, DNA cannot be entered into CODIS until after conviction unless there is probable cause to test. I can only imagine what else police will find once RH is convicted and they can enter his DNA into the national database.
Click to expand...

wow. I never knew this. Is there no way around this one??
 
Kudzuu said:
I read it years ago. It is basically a textbook on profiling. There's a series documentary of the same name that is really good but it has some things thrown in to make it movie like.
Click to expand...
Was it the series with Ed Kemper in the first season? If it is, I had started watching it and loved it but for some reason I never finished the series
 
iamshadow21 said:
There's DNA in Tina's case, too.


Since both cases have DNA, they should be easy rule in/outs.

MOO
Click to expand...
I ruled out Tina early on because she had no known history of being an escort. I had it right that he was a hunter, and hunting was part of his gratification, but I now wonder if he might also seized on random opportunities when they presented themselves. I'm trying to readjust my view of this monster in light of what we now know, so I'm taking Foglia off my rule out list. Good to know there was DNA obtained in her case. I don't think I knew that previously, or if I did, I forgot. Thanks for pointing that out.

ETA: I also feel as if I need to move Sugar Bear up a little higher on my list now. I had him/her a pretty low on my list because he/she didn't fit LISK'S "type". If he had a bucket list, for lack of a better word, than I might as well throw my list right out the damned window. Ugh.
 
Friday13 said:
It’s interesting ~ it seems as though the earlier victims that we know of where dismembered and discarded farther away from his home, some of their body parts scattered closer to his home and as time went in he got bolder in keeping the bodies closer to home, and his work was a little more “organized”, keeping Melissa, Meghan, Maureen and Amber wrapped and closer together, almost in alignment. Was he “evolving” in a way as he became more experienced? I don’t know what to make of this.
Click to expand...
I don't think "evolve" is the word I would use, but clearly his MO changed over the years. Whether that was because it had to change because he was feeling some heat or whether it was because he could simply check something off as "been there/done that"...I dunno. Yesterday dropped a nuclear bomb on me, in that it made me realize that this guy is absolutely beyond my scope of understanding and experience. I'm in the same boat as you...I don't know what to make of any of this right now.
 
Mountain_Kat said:
I don't think "evolve" is the word I would use, but clearly his MO changed over the years. Whether that was because it had to change because he was feeling some heat or whether it was because he could simply check something off as "been there/done that"...I dunno. Yesterday dropped a nuclear bomb on me, in that it made me realize that this guy is absolutely beyond my scope of understanding and experience. I'm in the same boat as you...I don't know what to make of any of this right now.
Click to expand...

I'm all the way over in Australia and yes, "I'm shook"
 
jessr927 said:
His first wife moved out in September 93 and Sandra was killed in November. His mom had moved out prior to the wife. So I think you're right. If he's not responsible for any of the 1980s victims, Sandra was likely his first.
Click to expand...
I just thought of something pertaining to his first marriage which could play a key role.
That is if Sandra was his first?

IMO:

RH's 1990 marriage to ER may also have been his first real intro to available sex with a woman, I have yet to hear anything about RH having prior girlfriends.

Who knows what fantasies RH brought into the marriage that had excited him to pleasure before the marriage and how/if he lived out those fantasies in his head while having sex with his first wife because otherwise he couldn't be sexually satisfied and if he did experience some level of satisfaction it still left him wanting.

ER left him and moved out of the residence for reasons , reasons that so far we don't know or may never know, hopefully LE knows.

After his wife left him RH then proceeded to finally live out his fantasies with escorts?

Then when he met and married AE he was able to have the family cover and still continue with his sadism/killing.??
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 116 more.
Total: 2,772 (members: 117, guests: 2,655)

Online statistics

Members online
117
Guests online
2,655
Total visitors
2,772
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
599,925
Messages
18,101,704
Members
230,955
Latest member
ClueCrusader
Back
Top