Karate Dad
Justice for Caylee
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 349
- Reaction score
- 0
Touche and they really shouldn't be on here if they don't believe it.
This thread was started to respect the posters on the Alive thread.
Touche and they really shouldn't be on here if they don't believe it.
How many rows of gates are on 1 Terminal side???
I know that Orlando is 2 Terminals....but their are rows of gates at each side...they branch off like a tree. Continue on...you'll figure it out.
I can only hope this is why OCSO discredited out sighting. At O.I.A...you have Terminal A and Terminal B....I said GATE C5....that is where we were sitting and where I saw Caylee...if you want to get real straight about it...our flight left from gate C6, since we were traveling with the puppy and gate C6 looked pretty full...we sat over on the C5 side so that we were straight across from C6 and so that we could give our puppy some water to drink before we took off to Seattle.
Wow! Great sleuthing!!! Wonder if that had anything to do with LE not believing that was a credible lead? hmmm
TTT: Do you what the Anthony's have done with your info? I understand they have PI's - are they currently searching based on your leads?
Yes, I understand this, as I have flown many dozens of flights with all of my own children. However, that is not the point. The need to check out ALL children on board no matter what age, not as determined by how the airline classifies them. All lap children should have been checked no matter how old the airline was told they were. AND all security tapes should have been checked from all three airports involved. AND other passenger listed in seats in the general area that TTT saw the woman seated should have been questioned. If this was done GREAT, but no LE report or documents confirm that it was done, so we can assume that it was not.
I did not take a photo of Caylee.
However, my sighting could of been well verified had they gotten films from the 3 airports...and BOTH flight rosters.
I have called 3 times to FBI with no return of my calls.
Yes, and why again are they looking for an alive Caylee and bursting in on people in the middle of the night if they think Caylee is dead?
Because LE will follow up on all credible information they receive - they have followed up on all credible information thus far - but unfortunately ALL of the so called Caylee sightings have not proved to be the Caylee Anthony the world (minus 1) is wanting to find.
Excellent sleuthing!
That "burst in the home" issue happened in Volusia County...not Orange County.
They also haven't come out with an official statement of fact that didn't include a lot of hedging, either.
The "we believe, we think, she's probably", and so forth doesn't cut it in the way of an official statement of known death.
They have allowed a lot of room for leeway, and I think that they are intentionally doing so because they really aren't sure that she's deceased at all.
TTT, thank you for coming on here, but I have to admit I am very skeptical about your story. First, you state that you called the Crime Tip line to report that you had actually seen Caylee, a little girl the whole US has been looking for, and you were put on hold for a mere 10 minutes so you hung up? Unbelievable. I'm put on hold longer than that just checking my phone bill. Second, you state that you called OCSD and got a voice mail so again you hung up. Again, unbelievable. Yet, when you reached LA and CA and also got voice mails, you left a message. That is only the tip of the iceberg of why, in my opinion, your story doesn't pass the smell test. Sorry, but I think you have some explaining to do.
OCSO had just adjourned from the Bond Hearing where it was first announced that Caylee was thought to be deceased.
TTT had the unfortunate timing of coming closely on the heels in the aftermath of that Hearing with the sighting of a very much ALIVE Caylee, and it would seem that OCSO does not want the egg on their faces of having to backtrack their predetermined theory.
TTT's child is 14 - NOT CONSIDERED A CHILD as far as airlines are concerned - so her 14 year old is considered an adult when on an airplane
No, you can assume that they weren't RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC.
Except when TTT booked her flight for her son and herself she booked it with the airlines as 2 adults again hence why the airlines is not calling her 14 year old a child. His name I'm sure appears on the manifest but they did not ask his birthdate when she booked the flight nor when they boarded the flight - so he has never been considered or ever will be considered a child for this flight.Yes, I understand this, as I have flown many dozens of flights with all of my own children. However, that is not the point. The need to check out ALL children on board no matter what age, not as determined by how the airline classifies them. All lap children should have been checked no matter how old the airline was told they were. AND all security tapes should have been checked from all three airports involved. AND other passenger listed in seats in the general area that TTT saw the woman seated should have been questioned. If this was done GREAT, but no LE report or documents confirm that it was done, so we can assume that it was not.
If the EVIDENCE, the Scientific evidence, is such hard and fast proof that Caylee is dead then you need to call OCSD and tell the Missing Person's Unit and Det. Melich to turn the case over to the Homicide Squad.
People have become invested in the idea that Caylee is dead and do not like hearing anything that contradicts their absolute certainty.