Kapua
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2014
- Messages
- 4,757
- Reaction score
- 34,239
He's out on bail, again!
From the Find Chari Scott page.
I am speechless.
He's out on bail, again!
From the Find Chari Scott page.
He's angry but tries to seem calm and cool. I think he's surprised he wasn't arrested instantly in Feb. and now he's tired.
IMO
You don't see the resemblance?
Reminder***
ID channel tonight
Special on Charli Scott.
I do not have access to the program. If someone somehow can post a recording, that would be awesome.
...Reported by viewers here is that there is nothing new. But, news to me is that a dedicated private detective had come to help the family (per some clips at the PI "Disappeared" website). Is he still here? Will he persist?
There is someone who knows where Charli and Joshua are and his initials are S.C.
https://www.facebook.com/FindCharliScott May 21st post comment.Everything about this case is disturbing. But I just read a comment from the Find Chari Scott page that really bothered me. According to the FCS page the MPD cannot tell the family what was found to change the case from a missing person to a homicide, but that it was something a person could not live without. That poor, courageous family.
https://www.facebook.com/FindCharliScott May 21st post comment.
That was horrific. "whatever it was that was found, was a part that cannot be lived without." I have to assume from that statement that some part of her body was found (total assumption, here), and if so, there isn't much chance a body intact could be found (which may be why LE is no longer looking for a body, but instead more evidence to tie what they found with whomever did such a thing)
Can anyone think of any other explanation for a statement that has words like that?
Can you be more specific? I can not find the post. Unless it was taken off.
https://www.facebook.com/FindCharliScott May 21st post comment.
That was horrific. "whatever it was that was found, was a part that cannot be lived without." I have to assume from that statement that some part of her body was found (total assumption, here), and if so, there isn't much chance a body intact could be found (which may be why LE is no longer looking for a body, but instead more evidence to tie what they found with whomever did such a thing)
Can anyone think of any other explanation for a statement that has words like that?