Mamamerced
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2014
- Messages
- 1,947
- Reaction score
- 1,628
Might implicate an accomplice or totally unrelated(?)....
Merde!
Merde!
Is anyone else a bit disappointed at the lack of definitive DNA evidence? I was really hoping for something that would link him to the crime scene.
I haven't been able to listen much today, but I am not surprised by the lack of definitive DNA evidence. I AM surprised that SC was excluded from the sweatshirt DNA and that it matched TWO individuals who are not SC. Interesting.
If I were the prosecution team, I would aggressively be fighting for the inclusion of the DNA evidence that was previously declared inadmissible.
Why was it declared inadmissable and do you know what the results were? Thank you
Why was it declared inadmissable and do you know what the results were? Thank you
I am very lax about providing documentation and I rely too much on sketchy memory, but I believe it was determined to be SC's hair. By whom I don't recall. The inadmissibility was due to prosecutors not giving results to defense in time and judge didn't want more trial delays, ostensibly.
Calling Kapua and Pua.
The answer to why is that the hair was discovered wedged into the seam of the pocket after the pants had been submitted into evidence and the defense argued late discovery. The judge ruled in favor of the defense.
http://www.mauinews.com/news/local-...sses-dna-evidence-in-capobianco-murder-trial/
Soooo...Gray sweatshirt tested with cell-collecting vacuum in armpits, along collar, etc., and DNA consistent with 2 individuals was obtained, but SC was EXCLUDED as one of the contributors. (think about that for a second)
It was found at Paraquats with the 32 x 30 black pants, which is the same size as the other pants found upon which Charli's DNA is present. So all of this clothing likely belongs to the perpetrator of the crime, but Steven's DNA is nowhere on any of it.
This is starting to bring up the hitman theory again for me....
I'm not sure what to think anymore.
Black jeans - Perry Ellis brand - mixture of DNA from consistent with 2 or more individuals. ???
Blue jeans - again a mixture of 2 or more individuals - neither Charli nor SC could be excluded.
Blue jeans - again a mixture of 2 or more individuals - neither Charli nor SC could be excluded.
I couldn't watch trial. So SC and Charli were excluded from the blue jeans. What about the black? Just what we need....more mysteries. Ugh.
Maybe jeans and sweatshirt are not related to crime or even planted(?) perhaps.
Why do you think Rivera is laying such a foundation about the clothing?
Cannot be excluded = can be included.
Looks like the DKNY blue jeans are Charli's, if I understand correctly.