One of the things that's been the most frustrating, in looking at this case, is that because it's gone nowhere in the legal process, we have been provided no examination of evidence under oath, and have no real feel for what the evidence (if any) actually shows.
To be clear, I'm not complaining that we don't know, because justice really isn't about catering to the outsiders, but it sure keeps us from having a valid way to verify or rule out any of our ideas. The devil is always in the details, and we have none.
And we thought that when arrests began, that would change soon. Unfortunately, it has simply caused more confusion as to what (if anything) they really know. At this point, I don't have real confidence that we will ever get a detailed look at LE's evidence, much less come to know what truly happened in this case.
To be clear, I'm not complaining that we don't know, because justice really isn't about catering to the outsiders, but it sure keeps us from having a valid way to verify or rule out any of our ideas. The devil is always in the details, and we have none.
And we thought that when arrests began, that would change soon. Unfortunately, it has simply caused more confusion as to what (if anything) they really know. At this point, I don't have real confidence that we will ever get a detailed look at LE's evidence, much less come to know what truly happened in this case.