passionflower
Verified Insider
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,750
- Reaction score
- 11,440
I just got home and trying to catch up.........still no girls.........![Frown :( :(]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I just got home and trying to catch up.........still no girls.........![]()
Thanks. No, I wouldn't expect that it would be publicized who collected the reward money. I was more curious about how often reward money was paid out, and if the reward money seemed to be effective in cases like this.
Another scenerio...What if the girls were out for a routine bike ride, did the normal loop down the carpenters street and then headed home (obeying gramma) and to have lunch and a cold drink. As a matter of fact, they were headed home when gramma saw them in the "alley"...but were stopped by two or more perps. Somehow the girls were lured off of the bikes right then (possibly with drinks or maybe even with force) and two of the perps quickly peddled the bikes to the spot that TG saw them. And its the perps who are caught on camera (wearing dark shirts) at the auction house. I do not think that it is the girls in that video.
Someone just said there is a loading dock type area there...how scary and easy is that to scoop them up and conceal them straight out of town?
I am leaning towards the fact that the girls are alive, but sadly were part of a human trafficking operation to make someone (or a few people) quick money.
Just another scenerio. But, I change my scenerio twice a day.
I am a loyal reader on here and when I am not on here my wheels are turning with all of your awesome insights and info. So when I get a break from my kids and mountains of housework..i will try and contribute positively.
With the technology available today, I wish LE could actually confirm or deny these are the girls on the bikes.
I do not think it is the girls either. These riders appear bigger than the girls and are wearing black!!
We know that E had a white shirt on and L a light green, so why is LE telling us this is the girls.
:twocents: IMO
RSBM
3. The Collins were at the fair last night, and will likely be at the vigil tonight. Where is the rest of the family of these girls....in supporting the efforts of everyone looking for them. Granted they may not want to answer any questions about incidents that happened recently, and certainly don't have to, but their appearance is crucial. If the girls are still alive (which I believe) the perp can further victimize them by showing and saying to the girls. "See your mother and father don't care about you. They're no longer looking for you." ETC.
Sadly, I'm beginning to think her parents are beyond the gasp of no return. How effed up...and truly tragic at the same time.
IMO, JMO, MOO, etc.
From an earlier thread - posted by considering
quote:
I hope someone hasn't already brought this up and I just missed it. I try to read all the posts but I can miss something. I was watching the video of today's presser and noticed this q and a between a reporter and the LE spokesperson (beginning just after 1:50 when there was a question about Mr. Carpenter, et al).
Reporter: Can you move the timeline up from the 12:15 with Grandma?
LE Spokesperson: No, that's the last time we have is at two.
LE says "No" but then he says "two." What's the opinion here? Do you think LE meant to say 12:15 (instead of two) or do you think LE thought the reporter had said "two" and not 12:15?
End quote
I've been rereading old threads and this probably been answered but I wondered the same thing. Looking at the quotes again, it makes sense he is saying 12:15 is the last sighting if you read it 'too' as in also, not 'two'.
One document I found says it is effective. I don't know if there are any stats percentage wise or if they are broken down by category to how often they are offered. ie: Murders, kidnapping, theft, etc.
http://www.ncpc.org/topics/home-and-neighborhood-safety/strategies/strategy-crime-tip-rewards
I wonder the same thing--what happened to Aunt T's 'random man' who saw the girls at 2:30? Didn't she say LE had his name? Did I dream that?
One question. How would the 2:30 sighting contradict the 12:20 biker's story? Couldn't the girls have returned to their bikes after TG saw them. Maybe the bikes were not in the same place when TG rode by as when the firefighter found them? Just spitballing.
The Search for Elizabeth & Lyric: Four Weeks Later
snipped the very interesting part
We also encourage anyone who may have had a minor or perhaps unintentional part at the time in the disappearance of the girls to contact investigators," the release said.
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/The-Search-for-Elizabeth--Lyric-Four-Weeks-Later-165745756.html
Sorry if it's a repeat as I've been in and out today.
The Search for Elizabeth & Lyric: Four Weeks Later
snipped the very interesting part
We also encourage anyone who may have had a minor or perhaps unintentional part at the time in the disappearance of the girls to contact investigators," the release said.
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/The-Search-for-Elizabeth--Lyric-Four-Weeks-Later-165745756.html
Sorry if it's a repeat as I've been in and out today.
From an earlier thread - posted by considering
quote:
I hope someone hasn't already brought this up and I just missed it. I try to read all the posts but I can miss something. I was watching the video of today's presser and noticed this q and a between a reporter and the LE spokesperson (beginning just after 1:50 when there was a question about Mr. Carpenter, et al).
Reporter: Can you move the timeline up from the 12:15 with Grandma?
LE Spokesperson: No, that's the last time we have is at two.
LE says "No" but then he says "two." What's the opinion here? Do you think LE meant to say 12:15 (instead of two) or do you think LE thought the reporter had said "two" and not 12:15?
End quote
I've been rereading old threads and this probably been answered but I wondered the same thing. Looking at the quotes again, it makes sense he is saying 12:15 is the last sighting if you read it 'too' as in also, not 'two'.
The Search for Elizabeth & Lyric: Four Weeks Later
snipped the very interesting part
We also encourage anyone who may have had a minor or perhaps unintentional part at the time in the disappearance of the girls to contact investigators," the release said.
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/The-Search-for-Elizabeth--Lyric-Four-Weeks-Later-165745756.html
Sorry if it's a repeat as I've been in and out today.
I just read that link twice...I don't see "We also encourage...." in that link...am I looking at the wrong part? What I do see is that they say they are still awaiting results from the "evidence" collected...hmmm
You're reading the same thing as me. They must have edited that other part out or something.
I just read the article and the statement is not in it! Where did you see that?
That is a weird thing to say, isn't it?! I am convinced that these reporters all need to go back to 7th grade and take some grammar classes.
Wow, they sure did. I found the link on twitter.
KCRG ‏@KCRG
Authorities continue to ask for tips in #evansdalesearch: http://bit.ly/QmmkLX (says 3 hours ago)
The article has since been updated, 5 hours later.
Story Created: Aug 10, 2012 at 12:18 PM CDT
Story Updated: Aug 10, 2012 at 5:03 PM CDT
http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/The-Search-for-Elizabeth--Lyric-Four-Weeks-Later-165745756.html
Is that the google name, 'dark net'?