she has also said alot of things that LE says are not correct:
off the top of my head:
1)last seen time (was reconfirmed today it was 1215)
2)clothing descriptions (LE still does not know what they were wearing)
She is also the one that is talking about the attorney.
Okay so say some members of the family have retained an attorney.. wouldn't you think that attorney would issue a statement?
We don't even have a name of an attorney or really know if one has been obtained... We only have what Aunt Tammy is saying... which in this sort of a high profile case is odd... The reporters would be swarming over that attorney for a statement but we have heard nothing.
:moo:
Agreed. Aunt Tammy is concerning me with her big mouth. I'm wondering how much of what she is saying is true, vs how much is rumored within the family or community?
I've been wondering as well why police hadn't tightened up the timeline after she spoke the other day and gave the 11:30am time. I'm wondering why we've not heard from the man who saw the kids riding on the trail within a few minutes of police being called and descending the area!? If police have his details, and he has given his statement, why don't we know yet who he is exactly? And he police cleared him, I would want them to state this so we can move on already! Either there was someone who saw the kids or there wasn't, or even there COULD have been, depending on if he saw the same kids -- but so far, police are mum on this one.
Is Aunt T by chance estranged from Lyric's parents? Perhaps she is getting her info second or third hand even? Is she spouting info like on the broken telephone school room game?