thecatmeows
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2017
- Messages
- 122
- Reaction score
- 808
I listened to the new FindJodi podcast the other day, which includes interviews with the lead investigator in the Michelle Martinko case. Until I listened to the podcast, I was pretty confused on why Burns would randomly bring up Jodi in the interview. After listening to the podcast, it makes more sense. Michelle was attacked at random in a public mall parking lot, whereas Jodi's attack was planned and targeted as most perps won't simply pick a random apartment complex hoping that a young pretty blonde will come in the wee hours of the morning.
Podcast 008: Detective in Michelle Martinko investigation doubts a connection to Jodi Huisentruit case • Find Jodi Huisentruit
Detective Denlinger said his gut feeling was Burns was *not* involved in Jodi’s disappearance and that his mention of Jodi was probably just “nervous banter.”
While there are some similarities in the cases, there are also several differences.
For one, Jodi is still missing while Michelle’s body was left in her car.
Denlinger also points out that Michelle was the victim of a random attack, while Jodi appeared to be targeted, given the circumstances of Jodi’s abduction in the parking lot outside her apartment building.
Podcast 008: Detective in Michelle Martinko investigation doubts a connection to Jodi Huisentruit case • Find Jodi Huisentruit