NSC?Foxfire, and also NSC who is no longer on WS.
I believe black SUV already was discovered to be insignificant. See below:I had a feeling the Black SUV would turn out to be insignificant, due to the fact the LE never commented or appealed about this.
The black suv is NOT related to the case... See attachment
There was a post at least a couple threads ago that I thought had some good ideas and I forget who posted it. But the person had mentioned rural mail carriers (or people like mail carriers in general) knowing the ins and outs of who lives where, who is gone, who normally has cars at home, etc. I think this is an interesting line of thought to consider. We have seen it happen before with a delivery person who came back to their route to attack.
If it's not someone MT knew well, I could see this being a really good possibility, even more so than a totally random outsider. Someone who is in the community or maybe lives in a nearby community but has regular business here. Someone like a delivery person or mail person (note, I am NOT accusing MT's mail person!) that would notice the comings and goings of residents, when cars that are normally at home are not, that kind of thing. Someone who may have seen Mollie when they were doing whatever their business is but may have never even spoken to her or just in passing "hi" kind of a thing. I am assuming LE has already questioned folks like the regular mail person, delivery drivers, etc that would have a reason to frequent the BF's house and her running route, but just a thought.
just a thought - if LE suspected this, at a certain point does being held captive or voluntarily living under someone's protection become a blurred line? re LE thinking shes staying bc shes brainwashed or this person legally shouldnt be covering for her anyway/give her the option of hiding....confusing to think about & hard apply concise labels to some relationships & situational dynamics in life sometimes.
I'm wondering why they don't take some of the reward money and pay the farmers to let them cut down the corn?
Katy, re: drones in the cornfields, I was wondering about this as well. I’ve noticed lately that these search drones are becoming more and more common in these investigations, practically standard like thermal detection copters, and suspect this has been/is being done, should a certain area of cornfield be deemed potentially search worthy, especially with FBI being on the case.I think maybe because the nation and the locals need the actual corn, for food and for animal feed, etc. And there is not enough evidence that she is actually there in the fields.
Could they fly drones with cams to check out the corn fields?
I wonder about that as well... even assuming she did leave voluntarily it wouldn’t be unheard of for a 20 year old to leave for the night intending to return early the next morning. Still, LE’s approach to locating her would be the same.Regarding the voluntary disappearance theory, when MT first went missing, my thoughts were immediately towards Iowa City and the University. Has there been any mention of MT having friends or contacts from school and LE investigating them?
We should see it here, and I've checked several times, but still nothing:Has there been any word on when they'll be having the news conference tomorrow?
Yes - she took a position with CUE and I believe is still working for them. I haven't talked to her in a while.NSC?
Thank you for your post, I agree one of the most horrible aspects of people going missing with no trace is how very many young women (and other ages & genders) go missing in the US all the time, and their bodies sadly are never found.Thank you for the kind words, I definitely needed them today! So many of the cases I follow haven’t been solved in months/years, and in many instances the body hasn’t even been found. Every time I revisit one of those threads and there is nothing new, I think about deleting the bookmark on my browser. But I don’t. These people cannot have us give up on them.
Now I want to go check her out and stare at her photo but don't have a name!(Thank goooodness, you had me in a panic there for a minute!! LOL)
(ETA-I’d be quite embarrassed if she knew how many hours I’ve spent staring at her photos )
(It is potentially RLish, same thought crossed my mind.)I can't believe we're on to thread 15 already, and we basically have nothing. The only changes from day 1 is that WC has been interrogated twice and refused a polygraph, but that could be nothing. For all we know he could be a witness. Or they found some evidence in a ditch on his property that could have been thrown by anyone and they're grasping at straws with him. Just like the land owner in the Delphi case.
I think maybe because the nation and the locals need the actual corn, for food and for animal feed, etc. And there is not enough evidence that she is actually there in the fields.
Could they fly drones with cams to check out the corn fields?