IIRC, the CNN source was sharing what would theoretically be involved in tracking someone on a cross-country drive. He didn't have first hand knowledge of this actual case. LE has not said they tracked him as he drove across the country. They said they surveilled him for 4 days.On CNN late news, a former LE officer talked about how LE kept him under surveillance as he crossed the country. He either never suspected he was being tailed or didn’t react to it. He’s no genius.
I’m questioning the accuracy of some of CNNs reporting. LE said BK had been surveilled for 4 days? Did BK not come home for Christmas like most Christian Americans (and a single guy) do? Because if BK came home for Xmas break to spend it with his family AND if he was tracked driving across country, that would be more than 4 days of surveillance.
I get the feeling he was surveilled for the past 4 days in PA, meaning they may not have connected the car specifically to BK until the trip home had already begun or he had already arrived home in PA. And then they commenced surveillance.
I also question CNNs reporting that genealogical data was used to ID his DNA. If LEs statement that they surveilled him for 4 days is accurate, it seems they nabbed some surreptitious DNA during 4 days (in PA) and turned it around quickly. And that sealed the deal for the arrest.
Because CNN says they traced the car to him AND genealogical data was used to ID BK. And it doesn’t make sense, IMO, that both things would be true.
But maybe BK did drive home after Xmas and he was tracked as he drove across country and coincidentally, they were simultaneously obtaining a genealogical DNA identification. But I suspect the panelist spouting that info on CNN spoke with incorrect info.
I’m tired, and am not sure this is making sense. I hope y’all can follow my thinking. MOO and JMO.
Last edited: