I am so stuck on this
Press release from Nov 14: (day after murders)
The Moscow Police does not believe there is an ongoing community risk based on information gathered during the preliminary investigation.
Press release from December 12:
Regarding the safety of the public, police recommendations for safety measures are good reminders in general, and in light of what has happened in this community. These reminders are not an indication of a specific or elevated risk to the community.
What information could they have learned so quickly after the murders that could justify staying this?
There were a few things the police said that have interested me.
1) Targeted attack- confusedly said to be toward one specific victim, then the house, then walked back to?
2) No danger to greater community - this walked back a few days later, reiterated a month later
3) Crime of passion - this walked back a few days later and not heard again
4) Definitely not related to drugs - I can only find the prosecutor saying this
5) The scene was so horrific many members of LE have sought counseling and/or taken time off to deal with it.
My latest theory is that it is possibly drug related. There are multiple cases throughout the US of fraternities and sororities running drugs through their houses. U of Santa Cruz, Duke, Chapel Hill, University of Washington... In fact, just a couple of years ago, there was a sorority sister who was caught dealing coke behind her sorority house in Pullman.
I'm not accusing the victims of these activities. They may have been caught in the crossfires, and were used as examples to whoever is involved. Maybe they got involved where they shouldn't or saw something they shouldn't (X and E).
The horror show of the house and the reaction of the police makes me wonder about who is behind the murders and it may be why so few people in the victim's orbit want to come forward with a full story of what happened.