My random recent observations:
For some reason I never realized the outfits K and M are wearing in the Twitch food truck video and
the recent "Adam" video are the same outfits they were wearing in
the common group photo that was taken earlier in the same day as the videos. It's not a significant observation, but it does suggest IMO that the night out for K and M was rather casual instead of something they primed and prepped for. I also remember when the food truck video dropped there were many comments about the baggy coat that M is wearing ("That can't be hers!"). At the time I rolled my eyes because baggy clothes are fashionable in M's age bracket. Or I thought maybe the jacket just belonged to a male who was with her group that might have been off camera or something. But in watching the Adam video, it seems less plausible that's actually M's jacket IMO. The sleeves are comically long, even for a Billie Eilish type look. Also, it doesn't appear there's another male that's tightly out with their little group - it's just the 3 of them (K, M, HG). I did a very quick google image search and don't see any older photos of M with that jacket (there's one of her in a similarish all-black top, but it doesn't appear to be the same thing IMO). I doubt the jacket is significant to anything but I'm just notating it because we're starving for clues.
Switching gears. There's a lot of speculation about a possible killer(s) profile based on what we know transpired during the crime. But in the absence of more information it might be worth looking at what we know
didn't transpire during the crime.
It's been stated that it doesn't appear the home was burglarized. It's been stated that there doesn't appear to be evidence of sexual assault. We know the thief didn't steal any of the victims' or survivors' automobiles. What else that didn't happen is relevant to understanding what type of person(s) may have committed this crime? The tires on the cars weren't slashed prior to the crime or afterward. Things like that.
IMO some of that stuff may reduce the chances of the perp(s) being gang/drug related and the popular voyeur/stalker profle. Again
IMO something gang or drug related would have probably also resulted in some type of obvious theft or property damage, which I know is just my pure personal opinion and nothing else. IMO I also think a stalker/voyeur would be likely to take a phone, laptop, or other electronic device that would give them access to more voyeurism than they would have had access to on public SM. Just more speculation of course.
I'm not throwing anything out as far as profile possibilities, I think just about everything is still on the table. I'm just using this quiet period to review what
didn't happen.