SteveP
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 4,587
- Reaction score
- 44,676
I respect differing opinions, as none of us knows who the killer is, and what he did, and we are all speculating, but I just cannot buy into all of the talk about Tyvek suits and "kill kits". Maybe I have not watched enough Lifetime crime movies or something. Many believe the killer must have been covered head to toe, and that is why he left no bloody prints or DNA behind, but we don't know that he didn't leave all of that behind. I think he very likely left DNA and other forensic evidence all over the place, either on the bed linens, on victims' bodies or clothes, or under a victim's nails, but I think we all know that there is also DNA of a very large number of other people in that house, and the killer's has to be plucked out of all of those, and then there must be something on file to match it to.
I believe the killer likely wore a cap and something covering his face, and may have worn gloves, (which he may have removed to hold knife better), all of which would appear normal if he was seen out on a cold November night. A heavy winter coat would also cover bloody clothes somwhat. I highly doubt every inch of his body was covered, and doubt he kept a kill kit by his side. (I'm not even sure what one would put in a kill kit, and am not about to google it). JMO
I believe the killer likely wore a cap and something covering his face, and may have worn gloves, (which he may have removed to hold knife better), all of which would appear normal if he was seen out on a cold November night. A heavy winter coat would also cover bloody clothes somwhat. I highly doubt every inch of his body was covered, and doubt he kept a kill kit by his side. (I'm not even sure what one would put in a kill kit, and am not about to google it). JMO
Last edited: