I am not laughing at the situation. I am heartbroken by it. I am laughing at the lack of insight some folk have.
The point being missed is that unless there were 2 perps working in tandem, one victim in each room had to have been stabbed first. So, the second in each room was likely the one who was awake and fought back.
Again, don’t make assumptions about what I found amusing. It certainly wasn’t 4 beautiful, innocent young adults being murdered in their beds.
I only assumed you meant to indicate you were LOL. That's all. I have no clue why you were LOL.
No aspect of this is LOL for me. But I've been told I'm very serious.
People vary in insight, and I don't laugh at that, either. That's the real world and not everyone shares the same knowledge base - or your apparent certainty about what happened. I am completely clueless as to this case.
Sure, one victim in each room had to be stabbed first. If that was one stab per victim, rapid succession (2-3 seconds), there's no way of determining that, IMO. If you can provide any academic literature that helps us forensic people know who is stabbed first when two people are stabbed almost instantaneously, I'd be very appreciative.
Because someone who comes in prepared to stab two people (or shoot two people for a more common scenario) ey weis a different kind of perp than one that focus mostly on one victim first, then the other. Further, in this case, since two of the victims resemble each other superficially (K and M) and were also (apparently) in the same room (at least after the event started - I'm not convinced that they were initially sleeping together), I can envision several different scenarios accounting for the differences in wounds. And none of that is diagnostic for who got stabbed first or whether the killer alternated between victims on a rapid, more or less equal basis (possibly to be called frenzied in common speech).
It's a big difference to me, forensically.
So, maybe you can tell me what you think being stabbed first means? Proximity to the door? Apparent risk to the perp? Target? Do you have enough information? (I am only asking for your opinion, naturally). I made no assumptions about
why you were LOL. I'd love to have a conversation about your own assumptions. We can agree that there were two pairs of victims, right? Beyond that - who came first?