Purplepixii
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2015
- Messages
- 1,414
- Reaction score
- 3,000
<snipped>
Again, here is Jaryds story. A three year old who was hiking with a large group of people. He had ran ahead and was never seen again. Nobody heard a sound. They had hundreds of searchers. They had helicopters that looked for him. Nothing was found. No blood. No shoes. Nothing. Till three year later two hikers stumbled across some of his clothes. It turns out a ml did take him and do that to him.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/shredded-clothes-tell-sad-story-10-06-2003/
Before I start, I want to say I am not "attacking" you personally Giagreen, more the article you have linked. I have BBM key words/sentences.
Taking that link, the first paragraph reads "Authorities said Tuesday they believe a toddler who vanished on a mountain hike 3½ years ago was attacked by an animal, probably a mountain lion."
Another paragraph in the same article says "The sheriff said the case appears to be consistent with an attack by a mountain lion, but said authorities may never learn what happened."
Finally, another paragraph says "Forensics expert Jack Swanburg said it's not unusual to find clothes without a body in the wilderness because of scavenger animals."
So I did a bit more digging and found this article: http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/partial-remains-of-missing-littleton-boy-found
2nd paragraph of this article reads "The boy disappeared in October 1999 while hiking in the Comanche Peak Wilderness Area (pictured, left) with a church group and authorities believed he was grabbed by a mountain lion while running along the trail alone, although no evidence of a lion attack was ever found."
In the same article "The top of a skull and a small tooth were discovered approximately 150 feet from where the clothing was found"
And also "investigators had to "scramble up the slope on all fours" to recover the rest of the boy's clothing."
What these articles tell me is:
1/ Jaryd Atadero went missing
2/ Partial remains have been found which are separate to some clothing remains
That's it.
Therefore, I am not sold on the SMLDI theory, no matter how persuasive some theories appear to be. And I believe that if they ever do find De'Orr in that area, and the situation is similar to Jaryd's (separate clothes from remains) this whole argument will flare again. But I will only ever believe a wild animal was the cause of death if there is solid medical evidence that a wild animal attacked & killed a person because it's just as likely that a scavenger animal would make the most of a "free meal" and separate the clothing from the remains - it's what they do.
MOO