LovesPeace2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
- Messages
- 2,640
- Reaction score
- 23,964
Oh flipping delay delay delay
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IDAHO not UtahThat’s smart of him. He knows Chad needs a DP qualified team. Utah will foot the bill. I hope CD doesn’t get a lighter sentence.
So let me see if I’m following all this….
1) CD hired JP in May 2021 with his own funds - presumedly whatever was left over of the insurance money as well as his interest in the family home
2) the state, announces their intent to seek the death penalty in August 2021 but JP stays on the case as sole attorney
3) CD was declared indigent in January 2023 - in large part because JP had taken all his remaining funds and his home as payment
4) JP could have requested a death penalty qualified attorney be appointed at that time to be paid for by the state but chose to try to find one on his own and get him qualified and then paid for by the state - only that hasn’t worked out
5) the court was under no obligation to appoint death penalty, qualified attorney at that time because CD was already represented by counsel he retained with his own funds. And apparently JP could represent CD in a death penalty case without being death penalty qualified as long as he was paid by CD and not requesting payment from the state for his indigent client.
6) Had JP requested to be removed from the case a year ago or asked the court to appoint a state funded death penalty qualified attorney to assist him at that time they would be ready to proceed to trial as scheduled in April.
7) now, after failing in his attempt to have the death penalty removed, he wants completely off the case and new state appointed attorneys to have to start all over
if my understanding of the above is accurate, I do not believe the court will have any choice, but to appoint to death penalty, qualified attorneys as soon as possible. However I do not think JP should be allowed to withdraw from the case, but should remain on the defense team, not as the lead attorney any longer, but to assist a new counsel with his knowledge of the case to date. I don’t know if there are any legal grounds for forcing him to stay on the case but I believe he is manipulating the entire situation And that it would be wrong to allow him to walk away at this point. But I also think this motion and the timing of this motion demonstrate that he is exactly the kind of lawyer I have always thought he was. He’s given me the creeps all along.
And Charles.Prior really is a piece of work. I guess he got the house and figures that is enough for the little amount of work he has done already. I would feel sorry for Chad but that isn't even a possible emotion I could ever feel for him.
This is another delay that will probably be at least another year for justice for Tammy and the kids.
Chad was not indicted for Charles' murder. This has no effect on Lori's Arizona trials.And Charles.
I wonder if the attorney he was trying to prepare for state sanction was that crackpot attorney (whose name escapes me)?
Very wise words. Good things come to those who wait.
Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest since Means previously represented Lori?I wonder if the attorney he was trying to prepare for state sanction was that crackpot attorney (whose name escapes me)?
Aha, Mark Means.
Didn't Prior take ownership of the Daybell home? I may be confused.Prior knew for a year that Chad had no funds to pay him, yet he stayed on the case. At minimum he should have to remain on the case and perhaps be compensated at a public defenders rate. I call BS!
Another BS delay. MOO
Didn't Prior take ownership of the Daybell home? I may be confused.
They gave the perfect answer.Very wise words. Good things come to those who wait.
Oh, I 100% believe this is exactly the case. CD has been using every possible delay tactic from the beginning, and now that he's seen how LVD's trial went, I think he's even less eager to step into that courtroom.unless delay was one of the goals