dixiegirl1035
I will do it, but I won't like it
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2017
- Messages
- 12,887
- Reaction score
- 99,736
To me, this has nothing to do with MG. IMO she is a very minor player. Her part came months after the actual murders.
Who killed those kids, how and when, which person actually snuffed out their lives, and can we prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Not speculation or imagination or jumping to conclusions based on emotions, but hard, undeniable evidence is what a murder trial would be about.
ETA: as an example, a precise cause of death and proof that the defendents possessed that particular type of murder weapon is very important to a conviction.
Understood. I think that on this thread there are two differing kinds of discussions are going on, and sometimes folks miscontrue unless familiar with the previous stance of the OP.
In addition, as to being a "minor player as to murders"... that is also perhaps two different conversations going on. I was talking about her as to the charges against Lori and Chad that exist now, which are indeed months after the murder.
Many of the discussions are throwing out what they think the defense is going to do... and like myself, don't preface with "I don't believe this, but this is where the defense may go" and perhaps some think that is my stance.
I will try to be clearer in the future.