indicolite22
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2019
- Messages
- 10,302
- Reaction score
- 85,995
I must have missed something somewhere. What is LH implying is being covered up by the judge?Lori Hellis' motion was denied again on a technicality:
She believes there has been a cover-up:
I'd like to know, too. That's a pretty dangerous accusation unless she has proof. JMOI must have missed something somewhere. What is LH implying is being covered up by the judge?
I must have missed something somewhere. What is LH implying is being covered up by the judge?
Interesting that Boyce denied Lori Hellis' motions due to a simple typo yet put up with Mark Means and his rambling motions and shenanigans for a long, long time. Just an observation.I must have missed something somewhere. What is LH implying is being covered up by the judge?
Doesn’t that also undercut her argument that the Court has sealed everything up? If she already “knows”…..I’m just confused a bit.
It IS a big accusation to make, y’all are correct. You’d think she’d have something to back that up but at the same time it feels to me any back up for that argument would also show that she somehow has what has been sealed…..like what….?!?
Playing the Devil’s Advocate here, have those Orders for (the new) Denials been made public? If not, then is it just her word on why it was Denied?Interesting that Boyce denied Lori Hellis' motions due to a simple typo yet put up with Mark Means and his rambling motions and shenanigans for a long, long time. Just an observation.
Isn't Hellis just saying she "knows" the judge wants the sealed information to remain under cover (aka sealed aka secret) since he's refusing her motions on such minor technicalities as a typo in a footnote?? She isn't saying she knows what is within the sealed documents... or at least that's my understanding. If we go back and read the posts on page 10 of thread #31 of this case here on WS, we can see Mark Means' incorrect and mixed word usage (personnel/personal) within a footnote of a motion he filed (among other errors and typos of same doc - he couldn't even spell the names correctly!!). Evidently, minor technicalities such as these were NOT a problem for the judge. However, now that it's Lori Hellis that is filing motions in his court... he's become a stickler for punctuation, etc?? My confusion is WHY would a comma or semi-colon or typo NOW be so important to Judge Boyce?! jmo
her other tweets paint a bigger picture.
Replying to someone “
That is not the reason he
doesn't want these documents
unsealed. Once they are
unsealed, you will understand.” Source
and
“Trust me when I tell you this is purely self-preservation. He does not want the public to know what is in those documents.” Source
Everyone may have their own perception of whatever she is implying, I think such public tweets could undercut her arguments but that’s just my perception.
Shocked. I hope charges aren’t real. Maybe his wife is like his mother?