SaguaroSpirit
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2016
- Messages
- 1,942
- Reaction score
- 19,370
ImgurYeah, and drop the sandwich and smudge some dirt on it.
ImgurYeah, and drop the sandwich and smudge some dirt on it.
He says they do have a very strong case but no case is slam-dunk. The defense team seems to be changing from ”How dare you say he’s making it up?” to they wanna do their own investigation. What they seem to be doing is criticizing the police department and leaks and say how can we trust anything? If this goes to trial they will likely attack the two brothers who were suspects at first. The cameras not capturing the incident may help JS. It would be his word against the bros' word.
I thought the brothers were from Chicago! ?!
It's a matter of what JS thought, which JS is the one who thought it was good idea to do this at 2 AM during the polar vortex and then wear a noose for 45 minutes. Just because he has some plan, it doesn't mean that it's a good one. I think it was a bad plan to draw a palm tree like a whole host other bad plans of his.
Maybe they were lynchers from Hawaii?
Yeah, I agree. But I remember ”slam-dunk“ cases like Casey Anthony. What if they don’t deny he met the brothers? He called them. He even paid them. They were friends. But they were just hanging out and doing personal training and he has NO IDEA why they would attack him. Maybe they even bring up jealousy as a motive because Jussie had it all and they had nothing. Or they blackmailed him and wanted more money or they’d expose him (drugs). When he didn’t pay, they used an opportunity to beat him up. Lots of stuff they can bring up to cast reasonable doubt. Not that I‘d believe a word of it, but maybe someone does.I disagree with this legal approach. Police have so much evidence tracking the brother's movements that it is impossible to exclude Smollett from the equation. Their cell phones must have be trackable when they rehearsed the attack, putting all three of them in the same place, add in the money trail and there's no alternate reality.
It is a super bad blizzard snowstorm with winds coming down from the North Pole. Sane people are not out traipsing around in one.Could you please briefly explain the context for "polar vortex?" Where does that come from? What does it mean?
Thank you to everyone for the discussion and posting tweets, media links etc..
Just wanted to share my 2 cents. When I first heard the story I felt horrified and sad, but I remember thinking at the time that it didn't sound right, for all the reasons brought up in discussions here.
Watching his GMA interview and his behavior since reminded me of Jodi Arias. Can you imagine!! But seriously, I have not seen this level of arrogance, narcissism, bullheadedness, obstinance, stone cold lying since JA.
Yeah, I agree. But I remember ”slam-dunk“ cases like Casey Anthony. What if they don’t deny he met the brothers? He called them. He even paid them. They were friends. But they were just hanging out and doing personal training and he has NO IDEA why they would attack him. Maybe they even bring up jealousy as a motive because Jussie had it all and they had nothing. Or they blackmailed him and wanted more money or they’d expose him (drugs). When he didn’t pay, they used an opportunity to beat him up. Lots of stuff they can bring up to cast reasonable doubt. Not that I‘d believe a word of it, but maybe someone does.
Yeah, I agree. But I remember ”slam-dunk“ cases like Casey Anthony. What if they don’t deny he met the brothers? He called them. He even paid them. They were friends. But they were just hanging out and doing personal training and he has NO IDEA why they would attack him. Maybe they even bring up jealousy as a motive because Jussie had it all and they had nothing. Or they blackmailed him and wanted more money or they’d expose him (drugs). When he didn’t pay, they used an opportunity to beat him up. Lots of stuff they can bring up to cast reasonable doubt. Not that I‘d believe a word of it, but maybe someone does.
Could you please briefly explain the context for "polar vortex?" Where does that come from? What does it mean?
Oh, please.
...
<respectfully snipped>
Mark Geragos? Really? Scott Peterson hired him too. LOL
Then he has to explain why he claimed they were two white men yelling MAGA. That's the part that falls under "filing a false police report"Yeah, I agree. But I remember ”slam-dunk“ cases like Casey Anthony. What if they don’t deny he met the brothers? He called them. He even paid them. They were friends. But they were just hanging out and doing personal training and he has NO IDEA why they would attack him. Maybe they even bring up jealousy as a motive because Jussie had it all and they had nothing. Or they blackmailed him and wanted more money or they’d expose him (drugs). When he didn’t pay, they used an opportunity to beat him up. Lots of stuff they can bring up to cast reasonable doubt. Not that I‘d believe a word of it, but maybe someone does.
I do consider him a pathological liar with intent to provoke harm to many.
I‘m sure a good lawyer can explain that away. The shock, they were masked, etc. It will all be BS but all they need is someone who falls for it.Then why didn't he name them as his attackers? Yeah, no. He is just a lying liar. It's his MO.
Here's an article from Chicago the night this happened talking about the weather how it was set for extremely cold weather:
Chicago Weather: What Exactly Is The Polar Vortex?
It wasn't just cold weather but the coldest in years.
Then why didn't he name them as his attackers? Yeah, no. He is just a lying liar. It's his MO.