StormyNights
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2012
- Messages
- 908
- Reaction score
- 46
I hope they nail his sorry butt to the wall!!!:furious:
If I can find th eaccurate link I will submit it, but was reading several reports of Todd Smith's background intel and discovered:
- At 17 he poured a tank of gas inside his family's home with the family inside it, lit it, and fortunately no one was injured. He had a hissy fit, childish, because he was getting back at his mother. He was given 30 months.
- His retirement planning business was being investigated by the Illinois state attorney general for suspected fraudulent activities, but nothing proven as of yet.
So folks What's the Motive ?
Did Katrina know about possible fraudulent records of Todd's business and she going to make it known during the divorce as reasons for the divorce.
Did Katrina recently discover Todd's past arson conviction, setting fire to his parent's home with the entire family inside sleeping and possibly if they were proceeding with a divorce, Katrina could get custody of the children as the more "fit" parent?
Was Katrina dating openly and this became a jealous spouse crime of passion?
Eliminating Katrina would remove the divorce issues, possibly also any prior intel she knew about fraudulent activities of Todd's business.
Maybe Todd had life insurance on Katrina? This could be funds enough to pay any possible restitution back to his investors/clients?
And maybe Katrina had life insurance through her employer and Todd was the beneficiary?
If I can find th eaccurate link I will submit it, but was reading several reports of Todd Smith's background intel and discovered:
- At 17 he poured a tank of gas inside his family's home with the family inside it, lit it, and fortunately no one was injured. He had a hissy fit, childish, because he was getting back at his mother. He was given 30 months.
- His retirement planning business was being investigated by the Illinois state attorney general for suspected fraudulent activities, but nothing proven as of yet.
So folks What's the Motive ?
Did Katrina know about possible fraudulent records of Todd's business and she going to make it known during the divorce as reasons for the divorce.
Did Katrina recently discover Todd's past arson conviction, setting fire to his parent's home with the entire family inside sleeping and possibly if they were proceeding with a divorce, Katrina could get custody of the children as the more "fit" parent?
Was Katrina dating openly and this became a jealous spouse crime of passion?
Eliminating Katrina would remove the divorce issues, possibly also any prior intel she knew about fraudulent activities of Todd's business.
Maybe Todd had life insurance on Katrina? This could be funds enough to pay any possible restitution back to his investors/clients?
And maybe Katrina had life insurance through her employer and Todd was the beneficiary?
Almost everything you have asked here has already been addressed or answered in this thread and the #1 thread for Katrina. If you browse through it you will find all the information. All the questions about the insurance/investment business or life insurance policies are not a factor in this case.
The same goes with the fire as it has been discussed to extreme lengths with some very good locals information who lived near them or knew them at the time.
As far as motive, the only thing is the divorce/leaving him.
So you are saying that money has absolutely no bearing on this case? How are you able to say this with certainty?
So you are saying that money has absolutely no bearing on this case? How are you able to say this with certainty?
I wonder if the house was bought by her or put in her name later..like when the financial downfall of his scheme?
http://treasurer.wincoil.us/TaxRecord.aspx?PIN=08-30-453-003
Just type in the allowable years and you will see the trail of taxes on the house. She purchased the house before they were married. Also, those taxes remained in her maiden name even tho her married name was used for billing after she married. The deed is also in a lockbox. Todd Smith did not own that house. While property issues in a divorce can be complicated, it's quite possible he would have gotten ZIP if she owned that house prior to marriage and did not add him to the deed, etc.
If I can find th eaccurate link I will submit it, but was reading several reports of Todd Smith's background intel and discovered:
- At 17 he poured a tank of gas inside his family's home with the family inside it, lit it, and fortunately no one was injured. He had a hissy fit, childish, because he was getting back at his mother. He was given 30 months.
- His retirement planning business was being investigated by the Illinois state attorney general for suspected fraudulent activities, but nothing proven as of yet.
So folks What's the Motive ?
Did Katrina know about possible fraudulent records of Todd's business and she going to make it known during the divorce as reasons for the divorce.
Did Katrina recently discover Todd's past arson conviction, setting fire to his parent's home with the entire family inside sleeping and possibly if they were proceeding with a divorce, Katrina could get custody of the children as the more "fit" parent?
Was Katrina dating openly and this became a jealous spouse crime of passion?
Eliminating Katrina would remove the divorce issues, possibly also any prior intel she knew about fraudulent activities of Todd's business.
Maybe Todd had life insurance on Katrina? This could be funds enough to pay any possible restitution back to his investors/clients?
And maybe Katrina had life insurance through her employer and Todd was the beneficiary?
BBMPosted by Teeny Taurus Today 01:10 AM
Just type in the allowable years and you will see the trail of taxes on the house. She purchased the house before they were married. Also, those taxes remained in her maiden name even tho her married name was used for billing after she married. The deed is also in a lockbox. Todd Smith did not own that house. While property issues in a divorce can be complicated, it's quite possible he would have gotten ZIP if she owned that house prior to marriage and did not add him to the deed, etc.
http://treasurer.wincoil.us/TaxRecor...=08-30-453-003
DIVORCE LAW: Illinois
Property Distribution:
Since Illinois is an "equitable distribution" state, the marital property shall be divided in an equitable fashion. Equitable does not mean equal, but rather what is fair. The court will encourage the parties to reach a settlement on property and debt issues otherwise the court will declare the property award.
If the parties cannot otherwise agree, the court will equitably divided the marital property. Marital property is defined all property acquired by either spouse subsequent to the marriage, except the following, which is known as "non-marital property": (1) property acquired by gift, legacy or descent; (2) property acquired in exchange for property acquired before the marriage or in exchange for property acquired by gift, legacy or descent; (3) property acquired by a spouse after a judgment of legal separation; (4) property excluded by valid agreement of the parties; (5) any judgment or property obtained by judgment awarded to a spouse from the other spouse; (6) property acquired before the marriage; (7) the increase in value of property; (8) income from property acquired. <snipped>
http://www.divorcesource.com/ds/illinois/illinois-divorce-laws-674.shtml