Respectfully snipped
. . . . .
I acknowledge your defense of Mr. Lyons and respect you for it. However, you should note that if discussion of this case, and I mean ALL elements of the case, will offend or hurt you, maybe you should not read here. On the other hand, your input would be welcome and any corrections you can make to misinformation that might be received is also welcome.
Salem
I am much too thick-skinned to be offended or hurt by anything you and the others have posted. Irritated by the irrationality of some of it - yes. But offended or hurt - never.
All but one poster on this thread so far appears to be from somewhere other than Chicago and therefore you all do not know how things work (or don't work in some cases) in Chicago. I was merely trying to enlighten you on some things in order to focus your perspectives more accurately as to how those factors relate to this case and explain Richard Lyons' behavior here. Since many of you have admitted that there appears to be no accurate published timeline for this case, others seem to have "made up" one and ran with it, and I believe it unfairly makes Richard Lyons look bad.
Maybe some of you are gun shy here because you were burned so badly on the Kevin Fox/Riley Fox case and didn't see LE's obvious missteps (to be kind) from the beginning on that one.
Also, Salem - please be careful when you tell me (or any other members for that matter) what they should or should not read. While it appears you were trying to state it in a non-directive way that wouldn't be offensive, you missed on that one. As far as I know, the Patriot Act notwithstanding, even in George W. Bush's America, we still have freedom of speech.