tresir2012
Former Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2019
- Messages
- 11,156
- Reaction score
- 56,467
This may have already been asked and answered at some point, but I can’t remember:
BC pled “NOT guilty” then his Defense begins the case proclaiming ‘he did it, kidnapped and killed YY’!
Why can’t BC (or someone on his behalf) ask for a mistrial simply based upon misrepresentation or inadequate Defense?
I still don't get how the court system allows the defendant to state one thing and his Defense team to then say the opposite?
Ok saying he did it, he killed her does not mean he's guilty of murder. That is the difference. They may say he was acting out a fantasy in his mind and his mind was disturbed. They have the proof of him seeking help. They will hopefully explain in the summing up. MOO.