It's possible he is wearing a bullet proof vest IMO
Ooh that would make sense , I sometimes forget about threat of gun violence in the U.S.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's possible he is wearing a bullet proof vest IMO
IF the evidence isn’t strong, that may be precisely why the State doesn’t want to release it. They wouldn’t want to show they’ve arrested this guy after so long and have a weak case of largely circumstantial evidence. It could lose some confidence in the community; it could be played up in the media that they may have the wrong guy, it could make them look bad, etc. Just speculating though, IMOO.I think it's interesting that his lawyers say based on the PC affidavit, they do not think the evidence is strong. If the evidence is not strong, why not release the affidavit?
I understand why they asked for a bail hearing, it's his right and you have to do your job, but I think I would have waited until after this hearing today.
Gosh I hope we’re not dealing with anything like that! Yikes!IF the evidence isn’t strong, that may be precisely why the State doesn’t want to release it. They wouldn’t want to show they’ve arrested this guy after so long and have a weak case of largely circumstantial evidence. It could lose some confidence in the community; it could be played up in the media that they may have the wrong guy, it could make them look bad, etc. Just speculating though, IMOO.
IF the evidence isn’t strong, that may be precisely why the State doesn’t want to release it. They wouldn’t want to show they’ve arrested this guy after so long and have a weak case of largely circumstantial evidence. It could lose some confidence in the community; it could be played up in the media that they may have the wrong guy, it could make them look bad, etc. Just speculating though, IMOO.
The media has filed a brief too I believe. And frankly I think the public has a right to know as we live in a free society and we don’t conduct trials in secret. If anything needs redacting it can be accomplished while still releasing the document.It benefits the defence of the case against their client is weak or built on circumstantial evidence. If the defence wants it to stay sealed and it gets released I wonder if they can motion for a change of venue?
After what all has transpired in the Suzanne Morphew case, I get nervous about sealed affidavits coupled with defense statements about lack of proof evident presumption great.I think it’s strong because they had to get enough to get a search warrant in the first place.
Then whatever they found meant they was able to arrest him and charge him with two counts of murder.
I just don’t believe the evidence can be weak knowing these two small things.
Moooooo
His defense attorneys have merely filed what is required as far as language in a motion for bail.I think it's interesting that his lawyers say based on the PC affidavit, they do not think the evidence is strong. If the evidence is not strong, why not release the affidavit?
I understand why they asked for a bail hearing, it's his right and you have to do your job, but I think I would have waited until after this hearing today.
Interesting yes. Sounds like defense trying to send a strong message that LE has arrested the wrong man.I think it's interesting that his lawyers say based on the PC affidavit, they do not think the evidence is strong. If the evidence is not strong, why not release the affidavit?
I understand why they asked for a bail hearing, it's his right and you have to do your job, but I think I would have waited until after this hearing today.
Well if he did it, he already has more protection and a warmer coat on to face the cold than the girls did.quick video (barely) of him arriving surrounded by lE into the courthouse
Yes I’m a defense lawyer, I know what a bail motion is. I was commenting on the timing given today is a hearing on that very probable cause affidavit.His defense attorneys have merely filed what is required as far as language in a motion for bail.
“Offenses, other than murder or treason, shall be bailable by sufficient sureties. Murder or treason shall not be bailable, when the proof is evident, or the presumption strong.”
Ind. Const. Art. 1, § 17