MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,223
I have to say that I’m very curious why anyone believes the Odinist theory is exculpatory evidence (ie proves RA is innocent). Seriously, isn’t it merely a defense theory? Two FBI agents along with Click were involved in the Rushville report, it wasn’t an internal secret investigation. Nothing I noticed in the memo proved it beyond dispute.
Furthermore the entire status of the memo appears to be in limbo at present. Who’s to say whether or not the new defense team abandons the Frank’s motion? What then?
JMO
dictionary.cambridge.org
Furthermore the entire status of the memo appears to be in limbo at present. Who’s to say whether or not the new defense team abandons the Frank’s motion? What then?
JMO
![dictionary.cambridge.org](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fdictionary.cambridge.org%2Fexternal%2Fimages%2Fog-image.png&hash=9e6e23e216f9c15ea6b26763fd441465&return_error=1)
exculpatory
1. involving the removal of blame from someone: 2. involving the removal of…
Last edited: