sleuther0192837465
Stand up for what is right even if you stand alone
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,209
- Reaction score
- 18,579
IN LE has never, not once, ever stated that they definitively have BG's DNA. Only that they have DNA & that they were processing it to see what type of DNA they DO have. This is why I get so frustrated with this case. But I do understand the need to keep things quiet. UGH! MOOI'm guessing that no DNA hit so far means no match to Delphi? Seems like they would zero on Delphi as a priority when looking at other unsolved cases.
Or....was there no DNA at Delphi? Do we have a definitive answer about Delphi DNA?
Checked the thread title before posting....I deleted a sentence in this post as it belongs on the other thread. Only pointing that out as a reminder to self to be mindful of the thread topic.
jmo
ETA: I agree with you, you would think they'd check TB's DNA against BG's DNA ASAP, right? MOO