I'm just going to throw this out there, to the religious or non or in between, I mean no disrespect to the victims, their families or anyone who reads this.
I watched the movie, The Shack and summarized it in a post. At the time I took it literally, meaning the shack could have something to do with the crime scene. However, this movie or book is one that I'd never heard of, but many people had, especially those who read fiction involving Christianity. That is why I think DC mentioned it. The basic theme is the main character "loses" his religion because his daughter is murdered. In the daytime, in the woods, is quickly noticed missing...sound familiar? The Holy Trinity is personified and the man journeys back to being a believer.
Here is the zinger. I am listening to the podcast The Daily Audio Bible, and of course I'm behind. Yesterday I got to February 13th. The Gospel reading was Matthew 27:32 - 66. I immediately thought of how rattled DC was at the presser when he said (not quoting but something to this effect) I am sure they are not experiencing now the way you left them. Someone correct me please if you can clarify the meaning or give his exact words.
Could BG be mocking the police, the victims, the families, someone in particular, or the religious community? I don't know and this is just wild speculation. But the religious twist in this case is unlike most where they ask for prayers and to give the family privacy. I'm thinking the reading could be about the crime scene and perhaps there is a connection. I do not know for a fact that the readings are the same from year to year in the DAB, but my Daily Bible readings are the same this year as a couple of years ago. I found it odd that reading is on the anniversary of Abby and Libby's deaths.
Sorry for the long post, and MOO. I hope I am wrong in even thinking this. Because it would be pure evil.
I don’t think BG is mocking anyone. I think he is scared.
However... the police may be making a crucial mistake if they are focusing on Delphi people. Unless they know who the DNA belongs to. If they do, it becomes a game with BG for them.
But reading through old Chikatilo case, I was surprised at the similarity of the thinking. This is why I am not sure psychological portraits necessarily apply. The police thought it was a gang of youths, for whom killings were initiation, that these were satanist, or small sectarian groups. They arrested (and shot) someone, they went after gays, after known pedophiles. It ended up being one quiet guy, a teacher, with impotence.
So unless they have touch DNA of a person who had no business being next to Abby and Libby, they may still not know.
Ahh, perhaps BG had to make a 'left turn' to get back to his parked vehicle by the abandoned CPS building.
He looked at “Mary Gerard” (I think?) sign and turned left. Something about the turn.
So the way to interpret it, DC is telling a story of the crime in hints.
The shack, truly, might be some building. CPS or a shed, we don’t know. The person either has parents, or is married. He has changed his appearance after murders. Maybe looks depressed. He is walking in plain sight, or was walking in plain sight that day. He goes to church. He probably told someone. Confused, maybe? He feels bad about the situation. He looked at the sign and turned left (or right?). It is about him taking a turn. Or maybe, the girls took the wrong turn and ran into something? Someone? He inserted himself into the investigation. (Has a possibility to do so? Close to the police? In the police?)
So each time DC says something making no sense, I assume he is talking to the killer.
I think by changing the sketches they are putting pressure on someone. Maybe a few people, maybe they still have several POIs.
