I agree with this 100%. I've always believed that escape through the back way toward the cemetery was easily the most logical. I did not take the short drive to the cemetery, which I now regret. However, I know I have a tendency to push matters. I was worried if I got over there I'd probably be tempted to traipse down toward the bodies location. It would have been 50/50.
I don't think it requires mental images of the cemetery area to grasp the fundamental basics: Bridge Guy knows that this is going to take a while. At absolute minimum he has to be prepared for an hour. Now ask yourself how often cars are parked inside a cemetery for a full hour or more? And especially when it is a small roadside cemetery with locals potentially driving past in either direction. Parking a car there can only be attributed to a cemetery visit. There isn't excuse to visit an adjacent home or business, etc. If a car is sitting there for several hours in mid afternoon yet nobody ever sees someone sitting alongside a headstone, that is great potential to be stand out and be remembered...quickly mentioned to law enforcement.
Bridge Guy knows he can't avoid some risks. Parking at the cemetery would have been a silly risk.
Contrast to parking near the abandoned building. There are several things going on there, from the nearby State Road 25 to the Anderson buildings to Freedom Bridge area to the abandoned building itself. The presence of a vehicle can be rationalized in many ways, to the point it won't stand out.
However, the associated risks are the longer walk back to that area after the murders, and the presence of surveillance cameras on the Andersons buildings not far from the abandoned building. Bridge Guy had to weigh several aspects prior to this crime. Gray Hughes did a video in late October 2019 in which he showed the locations of two cameras on those buildings. I left on my trip a week prior to that video being posted. But I was already curious about the same thing, to the point I drove over there and looked at the specific nearby building. It was smack across from the abandoned building area but not tight to County Road 300. Maybe 50-75 yards removed.
If Bridge Guy did park in that area I think there's a good chance they have faraway video from that camera. It may be the reason that Doug Carter said they have a good idea of the beginning and the end, but not the middle.
I have always been amazed that none of the interviewers ever bother to ask Carter or Leazenby or Ives if law enforcement has video/pictures of Bridge Guy from a source other than Libby's phone. If that question has been posed, it has not been posed often enough. It should be a regular situation of make them respond again.
^^^^All of this. Bravo.
I've tried to come up with valid, rational reasons why Andersons' cameras might not have been turned on and recording that day (trying to choose my words carefully, here). First and foremost, they were "closed". I was there on a weekend the following August, and they were "closed". Meaning there was nothing scheduled, they have an erratic open/close/open/close schedule which centers around various variables:
1. Corporate scheduling.
2. Harvest times, which vary year-round.
3. Norfolk Southern drop-offs and pick-ups of grain and perhaps liquid container cars.
4. Corporate and private farm grain drop-offs.
5. Etc.
Could be they have various cameras on only at certain times. It's a huge complex, and has been there for many years.
Andersons schedules for all of their terminal facilities are on their website.
Early on, I'd thought well, yeah, maybe there is a connection to the Indiana Packers plant. I don't believe the IP plant has any connection to the case, and besides,
Andersons is right across the road from where this all happened. BG had to have taken the schedule there into consideration, in fact it would have been critical to him pulling this off with little attention given to him.
Why did Supt. Carter bring up the now-razed CPS building at last year's PC? Could it be another 'not showing their hand' type of deal? I believe last year's PC was mainly about rattling BG's cage, like "hey, we know you want to know what we know, but we're gonna tease you, too, BG. We know where you parked, but we're not saying any more at this point.". I believe there is more that they know about a vehicle parked there, they're not going to show their hand, not just yet.
Right now I believe this is a cat-and-mouse game LE is playing with BG.
I believe he arrived from IN 25, and left the same way, but then which direction on 25 is anyone's guess. Taking that route would have taken him past those cameras.
It took me a while to wrap my head around him walking all the way back up the main trail, and now presumably to the building near the trail head by the Freedom Bridge. I just struggled with that, thinking why would he go through all that trouble?
Well he would have looked like a typical trail user that time of year, even after the murders, except maybe that he may have been using some type of bag of some sort on the way out of there. If I had passed him, I may have taken note of his being there, but would have thought well maybe he has a camera or something along those lines.
People go to trails to enjoy themselves and relax, mostly. They're not thinking they should have their guard up for threats lurking about.
I believe BG is comfortable in his own skin, and was perfectly comfortable in that environment by Delphi that afternoon. Which explains his walking on the main trail after the murders.
He went through an awful lot of trouble to hang out there for some time, force two victims off the end of the MHB, force them across an outdoor space, across a cold creek, and then to the CS for the murders. He's in perfectly good physical condition, and that combined with his relative comfort and mental state means he could navigate his way back out of there, and slip away without people being any the wiser. Not much more trouble than he'd already been through that afternoon.
All the while looking like a fairly youthful cast member for a Rural King commercial.
Edit:
Thanks for bringing up DC's statement about 'beginning and end', which, again, would make one wonder what, specifically, he's talking about. Perhaps it is their timeline.
JMO