- Joined
- Nov 12, 2015
- Messages
- 332
- Reaction score
- 4,650
It could also mean "The family HAS brought us to a location."Families is correct. 'Family's' would translate to 'family is brought us to a location ...'.
It could also mean "The family HAS brought us to a location."Families is correct. 'Family's' would translate to 'family is brought us to a location ...'.
I wondered if they might've been fans of a show like Dora the Explorer and decided to go on their own adventureI wonder if they were bored with the parents in bed and stuck with nothing to do way out of town, and decided to go for a walk into town for ice cream or to run away from home, and that's why LE believe Lilly had her backpack with her.
They may have been ambitious, confident, energetic youngsters who wanted to get out of the house and away, and wouldn't have understood how far on foot it was or assumed they could get a ride from someone in to town along the way.
I wonder what the statistics are regarding the finding of missing persons ( solving a case ) when it is heavily featured in the media versus limited access to informationCanadian news has much less of a theatrical element than the US news, so showing a video like that, which only purpose would be for sensational content, would not pass the journalistic standards test.
I suppose in hypotheses put forward by adults , we think with a logical adult brain . Very young Children think with illogical and imaginative brain .If they followed the road, would there not have been enough traffic that someone would have spotted them? Because no one saw them walking along the road, it makes me think that they walked out the back door and into the bush then kept walking, eventually arriving at the pipeline trail, and from there we have no idea where they went. It would have been easiest for them to follow the pipeline trail once they got there. However, we just don't know what they might have done. It doesn't seem likely that they stayed on the pipeline trail or they would have been found by now. Perhaps they attempted to walk back home through the woods. I wish we knew.
You would need to factor in parent statement that both children may have an undiagnosed autism disorder (no I’m not looking up reference link, we all saw it in beginning).I wonder if they were bored with the parents in bed and stuck with nothing to do way out of town, and decided to go for a walk into town for ice cream or to run away from home, and that's why LE believe Lilly had her backpack with her.
They may have been ambitious, confident, energetic youngsters who wanted to get out of the house and away, and wouldn't have understood how far on foot it was or assumed they could get a ride from someone in to town along the way.
And they got lost in the rough terrain walking into town, away from where LE was searching (near the home and outward from the home), and made it some distance away.
Or
Someone saw them walking by the road and abducted them, them having left home of their own volition.
Someone they knew or a stranger, either could have occurred, IMO.
In such a remote location, it would be likely someone passing by might know them, and think wow, I know those kids and they are pretty young to be on their own, and they pulled over and offered them a ride.
And they're with that person(s) who had/has good intentions, and is hiding them and taking care of them.
Just trying to think of a positive scenario in which they still could be alive and relatively safe.
All JMO.
Absolutely agree with all your points!!I grew up in a similar rural area in this region and have children myself, and I do not believe at all that these children walked very far from this home. I will concede, of course, that children this age are capable of adventuring much further than expected. But I don't buy it in this situation:
1. It was cold outside - a little above freezing - and they weren't properly dressed. They would have become cold and uncomfortable quickly, likely still while within eyesight of their trailer.
2. Nobody walks on the road. It's not normal behavior to walk on Gairloch Rd. It's a 90 km/h (55 mph) highway with no sidewalks. It's not something that these children would have ever done before. You always leave home in a vehicle. A yellow bus for school, otherwise in someone's automobile... or maybe an ATV.
3. Jack is only 4, wearing a pull-up diaper, and likely underdressed. A 1.2 km journey would take a considerable amount of time. They would have stood out immediately to anyone who saw them. I can't stress this enough - there would have been immediate red flags to any adult who saw these two unaccompanied children that morning.
4. There's no other trace, despite intense searching in this location. If they were in this area, there would be something! Jack's pull-up diaper would have become uncomfortable within several hours and would have been discarded, etc.
I've felt this way from the very beginning - I am convinced that the children didn't simply walk away from this location without ever leaving a trace.
A couple of key clicks to area reveals exactly which stores are available to ponder. And as a Cdn we know which would have or might have cctv. One might wonder if it’s more a case of who’s in the video rather than where, and if there is audio, then what is being said, or maybe what is being purchased.Daniel stated he was not allowed reveal the exact location where the children were last seen on cctv in New Glasgow while shopping with family on May the 1st .
What are posters speculations on this location and why is it important to not reveal it .
I will google the area ,thank you . Is the area just New Glasgow Town or a specific shopping complexA couple of key clicks to area reveals exactly which stores are available to ponder. And as a Cdn we know which would have or might have cctv. One might wonder if it’s more a case of who’s in the video rather than where, and if there is audio, then what is being said, or maybe what is being purchased.
Yes the diaper/ pull up would likely be heavy , wet and soiled and if so would have been the easiest item for the scent dogs to locateAbsolutely agree with all your points!!
Just had a Google of Highland store mall . Although a lot of stores here are just run of the mill like Walmart etc I did notice it had a Canadian Tire store ,a store I would imagine has multiple cctv cameras.A couple of key clicks to area reveals exactly which stores are available to ponder. And as a Cdn we know which would have or might have cctv. One might wonder if it’s more a case of who’s in the video rather than where, and if there is audio, then what is being said, or maybe what is being purchased.
Cool @AddyFinch , wonder is there a Web cam for Garioch Rd and the highway that runs through that ,don't want to add the number as I'm unsure think it's 329 or 286 or somethingSome CdnTire stores sell hunting gear. Some sell accessories only and other have opted for zero hunting guns. I imagine there is plenty of hunting and fishing that way. Cdn Tire stores are like Marks & Sparks, or Primark with less fancy and more automotive, sports, household stuff.
Cdn Tire web cams are generally bubble from ceiling, and Walmart are at cashier direct frontal view, mixed with occasional bubble in specific areas throughout store.
I looked at map again, and there are lots of restaurants for takeaway maybe, and a building supply store for possible purchase of wood to finish the fence that evening.
The TransCanada Highway intersects with the mall roadway, maybe they were seen on a highway web cam Nova Scotia web cams
I suppose in hypotheses put forward by adults , we think with a logical adult brain . Very young Children think with illogical and imaginative brain .
This would be a logical path an adult would take
I think Gairloch Rd is Hwy 289. No cameras found on internet in vicinity.Cool @AddyFinch , wonder is there a Web cam for Garioch Rd and the highway that runs through that ,don't want to add the number as I'm unsure think it's 329 or 286 or something