Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol. Thank you.The goat was a companion to keep the puppies company.
I’m wondering if Libby was somehow communicating with KAK that fateful day while on the trails.
Could KAK have communicated that info to someone else or multiple other people? He is a predator. He’s in prison for a reason. He may not be directly involved but maybe on the periphery?
5 years and still nothing. I feel so bad for the families.
MOO
That's got to be the manliest lady voice ever , not a chance is it a woman saying "guys, down the hill".LE has said something to the effect of this was about power to the killer.
Power over whom? The victims alone? Or others associated with the victims in addition? Have to wonder if maybe someone related to the girls may have snubbed someone - maybe it was a sidelong glance in passing that someone gave the killer that he took the wrong way, or maybe he wanted revenge against someone for something. Again, I'm assuming the killer is a male, but it wouldn't shock me if the killer ended up a she.
Yup he's a disgusting in every possible way.KAK whining about “being harassed” made me want to throw something at the TV.
He’s in jail and awaiting trial on multiple child *advertiser censored* charges but he’s upset because he’s “being harassed”.
Respectfully snipped by me for focus.KAK whining about “being harassed” made me want to throw something at the TV.
.
You would think, but IDK what and who to believe anymore because we heard from LE that that BG and the killer are one in the same. But we also heard that BG and the killer were two different people. And we heard PH say that there was a possibility that there was more than 1 person who committed the act of violence against the girls. And we heard that there was only one video but on HLN last night that there was possibly more than 1 video. And we’ve heard from LE & the family of the girls say that the video was a few minutes long, so...¯\_(ツ)_/¯Ok... I have read that there was something mentioned during the HLN special last night about an edged weapon or something and heard that someone on the show was saying that DNA from the killer may have been degraded if it mixed with blood from the victims. So my question then is this -
We have heard LE say that searchers didn't immediately know what they had stumbled on when the girls were found. Wouldn't they have known it was a murder scene right away if the kids were covered in blood??
You would think, but IDK what and who to believe anymore because we heard from LE that that BG and the killer are one in the same. But we also heard that BG and the killer were two different people.
And we heard that there was only one video but on HLN last night that there was possibly more than 1 video. And we’ve heard from LE & the family of the girls say that the video was a few minutes long, so...¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I’ve been thinking about this today, that searchers did not immediately know what they had stumbled upon and the statement that there was a lot of physical evidence at the scene but not necessarily what you would expect to find.Ok... I have read that there was something mentioned during the HLN special last night about an edged weapon or something and heard that someone on the show was saying that DNA from the killer may have been degraded if it mixed with blood from the victims. So my question then is this -
We have heard LE say that searchers didn't immediately know what they had stumbled on when the girls were found. Wouldn't they have known it was a murder scene right away if the kids were covered in blood??
Wasn't it said that the two sketches were not of the same person? And DC has often stated that the killer will end up being a combination of both. And now, in this interview two days ago, he's saying the killer will have commonalities of both sketches.
I don't mean to start a sketch discussion again, but seriously, there has to be logic behind this because it's been repeated for almost 3 years. I have a couple conclusions, but I'm not going to share. It's just so strange...
ISP reflects on investigation on fifth anniversary of Delphi case | wthr.com
"That was a very significant shift for us and we fully anticipated the criticism, but remember, a sketch is not a photograph," said Carter. "I think eventually what we'll be able to do is, put the face of the murderer up in between those two sketches and we'll be able to merge them together and become one."
"But you think that the second sketch is more…" began Longnecker.
"We think there's commonalities between both of them with the individual," said Carter.
Kelsi German: I've found that it can be really easy for people to find true crime as entertainment. So, they listen to these podcasts. And they watch these cases on true crime documentaries, and they watch the hourlong episodes on TV. They're learning about these different cases, but they're not hearing a whole lot about that person's life. And it can be really easy for them, I think, to not see them as real people, and then forget that could be one us – that could have happened to absolutely anyone. So, I think when I share these pictures, my hope is that people will realize that or maybe even remember or start thinking about the fact that Abby and Libby were real people. They were real girls. They were real teenagers. And any one of us could be Abby or Libby. And any one of us could have gone through something like they had to go through. All of those great things about them are gone. We don't get to see them do art. We don't get to make new memories with them. But we can continue to share those memories and, hopefully, bring a little light to people.
I’ve been thinking about this today, that searchers did not immediately know what they had stumbled upon and the statement that there was a lot of physical evidence at the scene but not necessarily what you would expect to find.
Kelsi German: I've found that it can be really easy for people to find true crime as entertainment. So, they listen to these podcasts. And they watch these cases on true crime documentaries, and they watch the hourlong episodes on TV. They're learning about these different cases, but they're not hearing a whole lot about that person's life. And it can be really easy for them, I think, to not see them as real people, and then forget that could be one us – that could have happened to absolutely anyone. So, I think when I share these pictures, my hope is that people will realize that or maybe even remember or start thinking about the fact that Abby and Libby were real people. They were real girls. They were real teenagers. And any one of us could be Abby or Libby. And any one of us could have gone through something like they had to go through. All of those great things about them are gone. We don't get to see them do art. We don't get to make new memories with them. But we can continue to share those memories and, hopefully, bring a little light to people.
If those were his weapons of choice than maybe he dressed the way he did to account for blood splatter.Either he dressed wearing two sets or had another set stashed,clean up by the creek,walk out not covered in blood and avoid transfer of evidence to vehicle.I'd almost wager those clothes are buried/hidden out there.
I said almost because if he was thinking that far ahead he could have traded bloody clothes out with new ones used the same bag to put the bloody ones in and disposed of them else where.More likely to bury hide them than to take with him but possible either way.If he changed clothes and cleaned up in the creek, that MIGHT account for two sketches - people may have seen one guy wearing one outfit, and others may have seen the same dude wearing something different. Either way, nothing about him made anyone weary of him on his out of of the scene if anyone saw him leaving... You'd certainly have to ask why not.
If he buried his clothes out there, I wonder if scent dogs might have found them - if they were ever used at all (not sure they were)