Arkay
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 39,080
until I see hard evidence that this was a catfishing crime.. ill keep regarding it as a random one..
Snipped respectfully to narrow the focus. This is one of the honkin' big questions about this case, isn't it? I originally believed that the online stuff had nothing to do with the murders. Then after LE asked about A_s and we started learning all that stuff about KAK, I wound up changing my mind. There are just so many odd little datapoints (LG the day before, maybe even the day OF the murders, the flight to Las Vegas, the fake job date, the father's fake "not in 2 years, the DNA search, etc.) that I now think KAK pretty much HAS to have been involved in some way.
Maybe KAK killed them, maybe he didn't.
But isn't it a crime for an adult to masquerade as someone else online, with the intent and purpose of receiving inappropriate pictures of a minor? And then to make plans to meet said minor, (Libby) with full knowledge that she is a child and you are an adult? A different one than she expected?
So IMO there's still a catfishing crime here, and it seems too highly coincidental to me that the very girl he was to meet wound up murdered, that very day, along with her friend.
Yes I do see the strong possibility that it could be JBC or someone else. But a catfishing crime was committed and the target wound up murdered at the place and time of the purported meeting.
I waver, like you do, @AC4RD. Oh, and cheers to your Bulgarian laptop. It's doing the job.