For the sake of argument, what if everything we've heard is NOT just a fabrication by LE or a podcaster's source, but actual truth? What if KAK's device really did look up a gas station in Delphi on the day of the murders? What if a_shots really did tell L's friend they were supposed to meet but L never showed up? What if a_shots really had been catfishing L in the days/weeks prior to the murders, plus communicated with her the morning of?
Can the prosecutor not approach KAK's attorney with what they might call "circumstantial" evidence to negotiate a deal for more information from KAK? Is that not a realistic situation? I'm asking sincerely.
Can the prosecutor not approach KAK's attorney with what they might call "circumstantial" evidence to negotiate a deal for more information from KAK? Is that not a realistic situation? I'm asking sincerely.