sunshineray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2019
- Messages
- 8,615
- Reaction score
- 67,790
I think LE most likely has KAK videoed in numerous interrogations. They can also be shown to a jury, the man himself, demeanor and lies.LE could testify to what he said during interviews and interrogations, and show the transcript. This will prove that KAK is deceptive and they have already charged him with several counts of Obstruction.
My point was that so far as we know, there is no evidence that puts him at the scene. Usable circumstantial evidence could overcome this, but I've only seen conjecture and he said/she said hearsay.
Edit to add, It's very likely, in my opinion, that LE knows where his cellphone pinged the day of the murders, but are not going to clear him of being involved.
I'm hoping against hope LE may soon have worked out a proffer with KAK and arrests will be made for others involved.