Charlot123
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 9,001
- Reaction score
- 60,429
I am still firmly in the camp that I feel encouraged, rather than discouraged, by the most recent PC. LE has taken this new direction for a reason, and it is likely based on a new piece of physical evidence.
With that said, I am really struggling to comprehend the fact that the sketches are not the same person (to be clear, I do not believe that LE is lying). Honestly, it is not that the sketches look nothing alike that I keep getting hung up on. In fact, that would be a much easier thing for me to accept. It is the fact that the two sketches, who bare little if any resemblance to each other, represent the exact same underlying characteristics of BG - reddish-brown hair, same weight range, and the same height range. How unbelievably uncanny is that? There are two sketches of two entirely different people who look nothing alike.... except for the key published information. The only explanation that I can think of that rectifies those inconsistencies sounds crazier than the uncanny coincidence. Does anyone else have any thoughts?
Coming back to the two descriptions, LE has not wavered from the fact that the girls' murderer has reddish-brown hair. I wonder if LE found a hair on one of the girls. BG did make some mistakes...
I really do believe that LE has found something significant to move this investigation forward!
I think there is a solid reason for the LE to use the word "murderer". So if they stick with the YBG, so should we. Hair has follicles, let us hope there is some DNA from it.
I also believe that the OBG was someone seen in the vicinity, by a witness, so the sketch is not totally useless. That person might be unrelated to the crime, perhaps, even came later, but he is involved in everything else, to a huge degree.
I would be unsurprised if there is no confession coming specifically because of this person.