Found Deceased IN - Abigail (Abby) Williams & Liberty (Libby) German - The Delphi Murders - #149

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
sandy_80 said:
the latest episode of the MS with their very problematic guest have just validated all my opinions of them and their goals ...let no doubt stays
they cant sink any lower
Click to expand...
Yes, I was not impressed. It had that "National Enquirer" vibe to me. To be sure they have, on occasion, had a decent episode. But this latest was not one of them.
 
Last edited:
JnRyan said:
Yes, I was not impressed. It had that "National Enquirer" vibe to me. To be sure they have, on occasion, had a decent episode. But this latest was not one of them.
Click to expand...
If you want to believe second-hand information about what KK might have said, then the episode reinforced the idea that KK is basking in the attention. I wouldn't believe anything he has to say unless he can back it up with evidence.
It would be very easy for even the worst defense attorney on the planet to impeach his credibility, so no one is going to get convicted of anything based on KK's testimony.
 
you can disagree if you like
what they have done so far is giving this disgusting creep a platform and fame ..and he is milking it to no end ( this guest is one evidence ) ...and might also have been misleading and misdirecting this case ..which will show soon enough
...
tunnel vision can turn cases stone cold for decades ..we had many examples
logic asks...is this KAK acting like he was involved in some major murder with capital punishment ?! he seems to be having fun getting his 15 minutes of fame if you ask me and using all sides to his benefit..and why not ?
 
Last edited:
I wasn't big on the last MS episode, either, but one thing stood out to me. When they were reading KAK's communications, it was mentioned that he uses a lot of emojis. I'm guessing MS knew what they were doing by mentioning this detail...

Anyway, If we believe the 2020 interview chat readings, there are some that I noted also had a lot of emojis. Some of them are even the ones that include talks about being with an older guy, and the "is it bad...?" phrasing.
 
TL4S said:
I wasn't big on the last MS episode, either, but one thing stood out to me. When they were reading KAK's communications, it was mentioned that he uses a lot of emojis. I'm guessing MS knew what they were doing by mentioning this detail...

Anyway, If we believe the 2020 interview chat readings, there are some that I noted also had a lot of emojis. Some of them are even the ones that include talks about being with an older guy, and the "is it bad...?" phrasing.
Click to expand...
Define “a lot” though. I would imagine anyone conversant in emoji would be able to spot the difference between, say, a millennial emoji user and a GenX emoji user. And there would be a marked difference between someone GenZ to GenX. MOO.
 
Schatz said:
Define “a lot” though. I would imagine anyone conversant in emoji would be able to spot the difference between, say, a millennial emoji user and a GenX emoji user. And there would be a marked difference between someone GenZ to GenX. MOO.
Click to expand...
BornAges
Gen Z1997 – 201210 – 25
Millennials1981 – 199626 – 41
Gen X1965 – 198042 – 57
Boomers II*1955 – 196458 – 67
 
Schatz said:
Define “a lot” though. I would imagine anyone conversant in emoji would be able to spot the difference between, say, a millennial emoji user and a GenX emoji user. And there would be a marked difference between someone GenZ to GenX. MOO.
Click to expand...
I wish I could show you all my 77-year-old mom’s full-on emoji texts. Sigh. But I suspect where @TL45 is going with this is related to how investigators were comparing language in the various emails coming from that house. Seems odd I hadn’t really thought about emojis in this context of them deciding if it was one or two or more people messaging underage victims. It’s not just generation that would make emoji use differ. It seems like everyone uses them a little differently, prefers different ones and different patterns of mixing in with words.
 
Marzipan said:
I wish I could show you all my 77-year-old mom’s full-on emoji texts. Sigh. But I suspect where @TL45 is going with this is related to how investigators were comparing language in the various emails coming from that house. Seems odd I hadn’t really thought about emojis in this context of them deciding if it was one or two or more people messaging underage victims. It’s not just generation that would make emoji use differ. It seems like everyone uses them a little differently, prefers different ones and different patterns of mixing in with words.
Click to expand...
I use a ton of emojis (GenX), but my Zoomer kid informed me I was using them all wrong, and my millennial husband concurred. They have their own language and I just use what “feels” right ‍♀️.

Now that I think about it, emoji usage alone could probably indicate two different users if they employed them differently.

ETA: omg :rofl: because that woman symbol was :woman shrugging: on my iPhone idk #46
 
Marzipan said:
I wish I could show you all my 77-year-old mom’s full-on emoji texts. Sigh. But I suspect where @TL45 is going with this is related to how investigators were comparing language in the various emails coming from that house. Seems odd I hadn’t really thought about emojis in this context of them deciding if it was one or two or more people messaging underage victims. It’s not just generation that would make emoji use differ. It seems like everyone uses them a little differently, prefers different ones and different patterns of mixing in with words.
Click to expand...
This is exactly where I was going with my post about emojis. When you add a patterned emoji use along with syntax, like for example, the "is it bad...?" phrasing, I do think it might identify a certain user. A number of winky faces and "is it bad...?" are in the "Adam" chat about being with an older man. There were winky faces in some of the other emilyanne chats, as well. I'm no expert, so who knows what LE thinks after reading the large volumes of chats, but I did note that the chat about dad, which ended up going to Skype, did not include those emojis or phrasing. But again, I'm seeing everything out of its full context.
 
Since the river search ended and after all the crazy rumors a week and a half ago, we have had the absolute quietest dullest days we have ever had in this case. It’s like the whole case just flatlined.
I hope it’s the calm before the storm.
 
TheBishop said:
Agree!!! I want this case solved so badly, but I get anxiety when I wonder what I will have to consume my thoughts afterwards... I need to get a life now, the end of this is imminent! :(

(Old people's emoji! Ha!)
Click to expand...
I was deep into the Golden State Killer case prior to it being solved. The day the arrest was announced gave me such an overwhelming feeling of relief. No matter how much time a case takes up in your mind, nothing compares to knowing that the families don't have to think about the perpetrator roaming the streets and there is at least a smidgeon of justice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Fairfield County Jane Doe (1993)?

Members online

... and 73 more.
Total: 531 (members: 74, guests: 457)

Online statistics

Members online
74
Guests online
457
Total visitors
531
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
608,048
Messages
18,233,561
Members
234,275
Latest member
MaestraV
Back
Top