rsd1200
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2016
- Messages
- 11,477
- Reaction score
- 30,747
Is it possible the neighbors didn't know how the victims got to the place they were found? Could it simply mean they believed based on the terrain that the girls had been forced to WALK THERE?
I've been loosely following this, forgive me if I'm not on top of things, my hard drive has crashed and I can't get to any of my data or maps right now. I'd done a map for this, the other day, based on this time of year so I could see the lay of the land. I think, that if they walked through the woods on the side of RL's property, that it would have to have been up, away from the creekside. It just seems too thick, steep, and uneven. However, up higher from the creekside, I think they could have walked it. I'm not a spring chicken any more and I've scrambled around in all kinds of places, so I see it doable, but I don't see anyone carrying someone. The tracks would show that on soft earth too. It did appear that it would be easier for them to exit on the opposite side of the bridge, from RL's property, go down, walk right along the outskirts of the drive/road that is 625W and went down the bank, across the creek, and ended up on RL's property. If they'd done any planning they knew this was a school's out day, and most everyone else would be at work. Just tossing it out there.