Yellow Rose
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2010
- Messages
- 4,530
- Reaction score
- 34,814
I'm not sure the Daily Beast is credible. Why would they be the only ones to say it. I think it was speculation on the author's part, unedited.
This is the first I've seen this article and it worded like that. If true, it would rule out speculation that the audio, video and photos came from the cloud. The daily beast is not necessarily the most credible source, however, and I'm not convinced that part wasn't added based on assumption. JMO.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
EDIT of my original post: I got up this morning and re-read my original post as I wrote it very late (my time) and I do have a history of bad editing.
In re-reading the quote above it struck me that LEO Carter was talking about the video and what LEO's will see for the rest of their lives.
I am not sure why I didn't catch that before. I guess I assumed audio as I think that quote "stuff of nightmares" was always swirling around the threads as a reason why they wouldn't release more audio?
So, this is weird to me. This would say to me that regardless of there being more audio that there definitely is more video.It also says IMO that is must all be pretty bad or LE would certainly release more.
The video then must be fairly long as well. But then video of what? If Libby is recording, but the phone is not in her pocket, then how? If not Libby, then who is doing the recording?
Now one caveat to this might be that he is speaking of visual images that the audio creates when hearing it and that this is what they will "see."
That is also plausible in my mind. Sorry for another long post! I bore myself sometimes, honestly...
JMO
I dont have a link but I had asked previously too and someone did reply that the cache was on the North side of the bridge. Real close to the end.
This is important to me since I have not outruled the theory that geocaching may have had something to do with this case. Maybe indirectly.
If it truly was on the north side then its possible the girls may have located the cache before we see pictures of the BG.
It also may have nothing to do with the case either and is just interesting to me because it opens up the possibility that the girls may have looked for it and found it before we see the BG video. Because the footage on the video is toward the South side and the alleged location of the Cache is on the North side which they would have already passed and may have stopped around that North side.
This is all assuming they entered from the North side which I think most people agree that is the side they likely entered the bridge.
JMO
Been thinking of one possible way her phone may have not been taken by the BG.
If the BG was planning on taking the phone after he murdered the girls then he may have not cared that she had took pictures of him. He may have thought to himself that he would take it from her as soon as they get to the final location.
Somewhere along the walk the phone could have dropped out of her pocket by accident and when they got to the final spot the BG may have went into a rage when he asked her to give up her phone and nobody could find it.
If anyone has ever dropped something in the woods it sometimes is very difficult to locate something small like a phone. So even if he went back to try to retrace their steps he may have not been able to find it.
Either something like that or maybe some other SM storage like the cloud or syncing of devices is another way LE could have gotten the video. Some people sync their phones with their home computer devices and I think the cloud is used as part of syncing.
I've been reading what I can in the news and saw some youtube videos. I decided to join you. I really want this case solved!
It looks to this casual observer that the south side of the bridge where it ends in the woods is sort of a dead end where the girls may have been trapped since the tracks are still way above ground out there.
And didn't it look like there were some small paths down the embankment at "down the hill" so that others had trespassed on the property more than once?
His son is deceased.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320AZ using Tapatalk
I've been reading what I can in the news and saw some youtube videos. I decided to join you. I really want this case solved!
It looks to this casual observer that the south side of the bridge where it ends in the woods is sort of a dead end where the girls may have been trapped since the tracks are still way above ground out there.
And didn't it look like there were some small paths down the embankment at "down the hill" so that others had trespassed on the property more than once?
Correct, their backs were against a wall, so to speak, with the only way to get away from the bridge was down a slight embankment/hill. I think the consensus here is the perp accosted/abducted them while still on the bridge, he then most likely forced them off of the SE end of the bridge, then down the hill to the creek. My hunch is LE is stumped, no new news to speak of in three weeks. My hunch is the perp probably got it over with quickly, then was able to slip away unnoticed. Roughly an hour after the incident began, there were people on the bridge, and they reported nothing out of the ordinary. The perp got away rather quickly, and had plenty of time to escape the Delphi area.
I don't find your thoughts boring at all. Quite the contrary~ they open my mind to new ideas. Thank you for sharing.
It is located on the underside of the bridge and require a magnet. Think its a sign here thing. Could have told them there was a bonus one down the hill. Wouldn't even have to threaten them. It's down the hill. Here, i will show you. But we are about to be picked up. It won't take long. Follow me. Its just beyond over there. Ok. Just as the bridge is out of sight.
Sent from my LGLS675 using Tapatalk
Who is alive? The old mans son or stepson?
I'm not sure the Daily Beast is credible. Why would they be the only ones to say it. I think it was speculation on the author's part, unedited.
This issue has already been addressed. No need for snarky. I will not post any longer. Ridiculous
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-J320AZ using Tapatalk
This is the first I've seen this article and it worded like that. If true, it would rule out speculation that the audio, video and photos came from the cloud. The daily beast is not necessarily the most credible source, however, and I'm not convinced that part wasn't added based on assumption. JMO.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk