DeDee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2013
- Messages
- 7,344
- Reaction score
- 42,149
Yes, it has been debunked. You may zoom in as close as you like and see vehicles and people. Thats your prerogative. But the fact is, it is not physically possible for vehicles to be there given the scale. That is, it is not physically possible given the height of the bridge and the distance to those trees from where Liberty took the picture. Never mind the fact that the road you speak of is BEHIND her as she took the photo.
DeDee, you have to ask yourself this: how far away are those trees? How tall is the bridge? Therefore, how large or how small would a vehicle have to be for you to see it at your zoom-level?
Several people, myself included, have patiently and respectfully tried to explain this. Here are two examples:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...-Delphi-13-Feb-2017-8&p=13171858#post13171858
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...Delphi-13-Feb-2017-35&p=13247250#post13247250
This is not your opinion vs. my opinion. This is basic math. And the math doesnt allow for there to be vehicles there.
Its fine for us to bandy about here on WS talking about this. But there is a danger to it if someone calls the tipline and reports there are vehicles under the bridge in the photo. That wastes LEs time.
Your kindness is appreciated. I also posted an example of what the cell phone camera lens sees.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...Delphi-13-Feb-2017-35&p=13246968#post13246968
Was the photo posted of cars in NYC taken with a cellphone? I would not call in a tip on a supposition about vehicles since LEO have the original image. That is not what the tip line is established to do. I shall not belabor the point. I could be so wrong. You could be so right. Or vice versa.
I am much more concerned about where BG is currently located and what his next move will be. :jail: